View source for BFO-Intro-Fall-2026

==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==

'''Fall 2026'''

Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith

ONLINE, TWO CREDIT COURSE

This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an '''asynchronous''' and a '''synchronous''' part, as follows:

==The asynchronous part==

This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. 

The lectures will form part of the basis for '''synchronous''' working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under 'Grading' below).

You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.

==The synchronous part==

This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. 

Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper 
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&as_sdt=5,33&sciodt=0,33&hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.

For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.

Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.

==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session (synchronous online)==

Self-introductions of students

Idea of a course chatbot

==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.

==Week 3 (February 4): [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 BFO Tutorial (2019): A Series of 6 Videos]==

:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History.

==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==

:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?

==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==

:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.

==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==

:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.

==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of "sending a message" (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.

==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.

==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==
:Ingarden's work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden's work on systems of different types.
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==

==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard

==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==

:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as "Milk teeth are lost as children grow" or "Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months." The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.

==Week 12 (April 15) [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==

==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==

==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==

==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==

==Grading==

Students will be graded on the basis of:

:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semester 
::For each session, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to one of the video or videos scheduled for that session, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.

:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase 
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  

Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.

'''Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits'''
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.

==Background reading==

:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, ''Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology'', Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. "Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background," ''Advances in Knowledge Representation'', 5(3) (2025).
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, "Against Set Theory", in: ''Experience and Analysis'', Vienna: HPT&ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, "Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation," in: ''Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems'' (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.

==Supplementary Videos==

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link
|-
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw
|-
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions
|-
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8
|-
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ
|-
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw
|-
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM
|-
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM
|-
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw
|-
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw
|-
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0
|-
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE