<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Phismith</id>
	<title>Applied Ontology Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Phismith"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Special:Contributions/Phismith"/>
	<updated>2026-05-14T19:46:35Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=198</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=198"/>
		<updated>2026-05-04T06:38:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science and PhD Program&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Courses for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI 579: [[Special Topics: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2027.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=197</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=197"/>
		<updated>2026-05-04T06:38:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science and PhD Program&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Courses for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI 579: [[Special Topics: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2027.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=196</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=196"/>
		<updated>2026-05-04T05:49:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI 579: [[Special Topics: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2027.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=195</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=195"/>
		<updated>2026-05-04T05:48:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2027.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=194</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=194"/>
		<updated>2026-05-03T17:29:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2027.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=193</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=193"/>
		<updated>2026-05-02T10:17:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2026.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=192</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=192"/>
		<updated>2026-05-02T10:14:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI637: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2026.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=191</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=191"/>
		<updated>2026-05-02T10:14:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI601: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2026.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=190</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=190"/>
		<updated>2026-05-02T10:14:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*PHI598: [https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2026.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=189</id>
		<title>Ontology and AI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=189"/>
		<updated>2026-04-30T20:34:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 10: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 2 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;PHI 637 Ontology and AI Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spring 2026 - PHI637SEM-SMI2 - Special Topics: Ontology and Artificial Intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks 1-13 Asynchronous &lt;br /&gt;
Week 14 Synchronous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: [https://ontology.buffalo.edu/Smith Barry Smith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The course program below is divided into numbered weeks. The information for each week begins with links to that week&#039;s main video together with the underlying slides. (Transcriptions of the video will be added in the course of the semester). There is also additional background material which is provided as a starting point for further explorations on the part of each student. You should feel free to ignore those items in this background material which you do not find of interest.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a remote asynchronous course. Student presentations will be scheduled in a synchronous session towards the end of April. Additional, informal synchronous sessions may be organized during the course of the semester. One-on-one sessions with Dr Smith can be organised on request to phismith@buffalo.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get a grade for this class you need to submit to Dr Smith an essay on a topic of your choice relating to the interactions between ontology and AI, with one or other topics documented below as your starting point. On or before March 1 you should send an email to Dr Smith with a one-paragraph outline of your topic. Feel free to contact Dr Smith if you are unsure of what your topic should be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All enrolled students must email to BS a Starting Draft version of their essay by April 1 at the latest. Further drafts may be needed in response to Dr Smith&#039;s editorial comments. Students must submit a final, full version of their essay and of the associated powerpoint deck by May 1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Essay word length requirements are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 2500 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 2500 + 3500 words / starting draft: 1000 + 1000 words &lt;br /&gt;
:Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / starting draft: 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3-credit-hour students may submit one single essay with the corresponding combined word count.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grading will be assigned according to the following division:&lt;br /&gt;
:Essay(s): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Presentation (and accompanying powerpoint deck): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Class Participation (responses to presentations): 20%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;AI Policy&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The starting draft of your essay, to be submitted to BS on or before April 1, should be your own work. This means no use of LLMs. All students are, however, welcome thereafter to use LLMs on polishing their starting drafts, providing that they follow these rules: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 1: Include a declaration on p. 1 to the effect that the essay was written entirely without any sort of AI assistance. I reserve the right to use software tools, but also my own judgment, to ensure this draft was written by you. Grades under option 1. will be determined by the quality of your essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 2 is in multiple steps:&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 1. Create a draft in your own words of an essay that is about half as long as your target length. This should be a substantive draft, but it can contain for example rough notes pointing to further lines of development. Not only this initial draft, but also all further steps in the list below, should rely on study by you of the relevant literature. Both your draft and your final essay should accordingly contain lists of references.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 2. Submit this draft to me at phismith@buffalo.edu by the middle of the semester.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 3. You create a new prompt using your draft as an attachment with an instruction such as: &#039;&#039;show me how I can improve the attached&#039;&#039;. This will start a potentially long process of improvements in your essay incorporating further contributions from you together with assistance from the LLM. You should attempt to use prompts to manipulate the style of the LLM output in a direction of a style appropriate to serious academic research, with references, quotations, definitions, as needed. Most importantly: you should be aware that LLMs often make errors (called &#039;hallucinations&#039;), for example inventing references in the literature which do not in fact exist.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 4. the LLM has been keeping track of everything you tell it to do since you started the newchat. When you think you might be ready to submit, use the LLM save function to generate a URI linking to all the interactions thus far – effectively a log of your process. This log, together with your initial and final essay will form part of what will be evaluated for your grade.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 5. When you truly are ready to submit, press save for one last time and take a note of the link; send me this link, together with your completed essay, and with any notes on features of the log you which to point out -- for example requests that I ignore specific chains of prompts because they proved to be dead ends.&lt;br /&gt;
Grades under Option 2 will be determined on the basis of (a) originality of the initial draft, (b) creativity of your prompts, (c) quality of final essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at the synchronous session featuring student presentations around May 1 is compulsory for all students&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology (also called &#039;metaphysics&#039;) is a subfield of philosophy which aims to establich the kinds of entities in the world -- including both the material and the mental world -- and the relations between them. Applied ontology applies philosophical ideas and methods to support those who are collecting, using, comparing, refining, evaluating or (today above all) generating data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as &#039;intelligent&#039;. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create what is called &#039;&#039;General Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039; (AGI), by which is meant an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being. ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) attempt to generate data from other data, where the latter are obtained for example by crawling the internet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Required reading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-machines-1e Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]&#039;&#039; (Routledge 2022; revised and enlarged second edition, published in 2025), [https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9939883749704803&amp;amp;context=L&amp;amp;vid=01SUNY_BUF:everything&amp;amp;lang=en&amp;amp;search_scope=UBSUNY&amp;amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;amp;tab=EverythingUBSUNY&amp;amp;query=any,contains,jobst%20landgrebe available online from UB Library] . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also offer [https://www.routledge.com/Why-Machines-Will-Never-Rule-the-World-Artificial-Intelligence-without-Fear/Landgrebe-Smith/p/book/9781032941400?srsltid=AfmBOoor0YJakTv88G0LUq0tWvBh3YS604AK0Gfr8Bd0YYgsgq1U6J7y here] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: The Glory and the Misery of Large Language Models==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: A brief introduction to Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. Focusing on booth positive and negative aspects of how they work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMD_1yA3TXk Video1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Glory-and-Misery Slides1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/s/ufnf1gwozzzd3hpmcmmbz2j7l0dzht56 Transcript]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2: GPT-5 and the French and Indian War: Teach yourself history with ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm4mCgAsI6I Video2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/French-and-Indian-War Slides2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions to ponder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What does &#039;stochastic&#039; mean in &#039;stochastic AI&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is &#039;scaling&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are hallucinations?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Good Old Fashioned (Logical, Symbolic) AI to ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/B4L27eavNT4 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Slides-Lecture-2 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its inception in the last century, AI has enjoyed repeated cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment (AI summers and winters). Recent successes of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened a new era of popularization of AI. For the first time, AI tools have been created that are immediately available to the wider population, who for the first time can have real hands-on experience of what AI can do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this first lecture we will address the origins of AI in Stanford University in the 1970s and &#039;80s, and specifically in the work on common-sense ontology of Patrick Hayes and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics to be dealt with include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is ontology?&lt;br /&gt;
:From Aristotle to 20th century philosophical ontology&lt;br /&gt;
:Patrick Hayes, Naive Physics and ontology-based robotics&lt;br /&gt;
:Doug Lennat and the CYC (for &#039;enCYClopedia&#039; project)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why CYC failed&lt;br /&gt;
:Why ontology is still important to AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/History-of-AI History of AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://utt.hal.science/hal-02954862v1/document Where do ontologies come from?]&lt;br /&gt;
:See also references to Hayes in [https://www.physicalism.com/osr.pdf &#039;&#039;Everything must go&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: Limits of AI? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Video3 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Slides3 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Surveys the technical fundamentals of AI: Methods, mathematics, usage &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Natural and engineered systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The ontology of systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Complex systems &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The limits of Turing machines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Why AI cannot model complex systems adequately and synoptically, and why they therefore cannot reach a level of intelligence equal to that of human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusions: &lt;br /&gt;
:AI is a family of algorithms to automate repetitive events&lt;br /&gt;
:Deep neural networks have nothing to do with neurons&lt;br /&gt;
:AI is not artificial &#039;intelligence&#039;; it is a branch of mathematics in which the attempt is made to use the Turing machine to its limits by using gigantically large amounts of data&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/opinion/ai-gpt5-rethinking.html?unlocked_article_code=1.jE8.eAwg.I1yx07GQmDbh&amp;amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;amp;referringSource=articleShare&amp;amp;utm_source=substack&amp;amp;utm_medium=email Marcus on superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:https://www.wheresyoured.at/&lt;br /&gt;
:https://x.com/jobstlandgrebe?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
:https://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Ecological Psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jobst Landgrebe on mathematical definitions of consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Surveys the spectrum of transhumanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Debunks the feasibility of radically improving human beings via technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Explains why Sam Altman and other AI gods are so passionate about creating Artificial General Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. J. J. Gibson, direct realism, and how our behavior is tuned to affordances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-acronym-behind-our-wildest-ai-dreams-and-nightmares/ TESCREALISM]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Mind-Body Transhumanism and the Mind-Body Problem]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AI and the meaning of life:&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf There is no general AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Lugano-2025 Landgrebe on Transhumanism]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://michaelnotebook.com/xriskbrief/index.html Considering the existential risk of Artificial Superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology of the Eruv (why it would take all the fun out of real estate if everyone could live next door to John Lennon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we living in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:David Chalmers&#039; &#039;&#039;[https://www.amazon.com/Reality-Virtual-Worlds-Problems-Philosophy/dp/0393635805 Reality+]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Intelligence-Lugano-2025 Are we living in a simulation?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Living-in-a-Simulation On Chalmers on &#039;&#039;Reality&#039;&#039;+?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-in-the-Future The Future of Artificial Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine consciousness: Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are &#039;&#039;about&#039;&#039; something.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Lugano-Machine-Will Slides] / :[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Machine-Consciousness-BS-2025 Video]: Can a machine be conscious?&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt-JzB50sJE Searle&#039;s Chinese Room Argument]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs] &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918 Making AI Meaningful Again]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1258.pdf Søgaard: Do Language Models Have Semantics?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16582 Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for Classifying Objections and Constraints]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: AGI, Behavior Settings and Distributed Cognition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Niches Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Question-and-answer session with Jérémy Ravenel of [https://home.naas.ai naas.ai]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions addressed include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are you doing with BFO and LLMs? &lt;br /&gt;
:Can you rely on BFO still being operative in the proper way even after a new release of an LLM?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeremyravenel_why-is-bfo-so-powerful-bfo-basic-formal-activity-7250607560976732163-d7tZ/ Why is BFO so powerful?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-Creativity Explicit, implicit, practical, personal and tacit knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Practical-knowledge Personal knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==March 1: Submit to Dr Smith a one-paragraph description of the topic of your essay==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: Towards a theory of intelligence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/ontology-and-AI-slides-6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture6-AI-Ontology Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Definitions of intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. the ability to adapt to new situations (applies both to humans and to animals) &lt;br /&gt;
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Ryan Muldoon, &amp;quot;Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Philosophy Compass&#039;&#039; 8 (2):117-125 (2013) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team made of humans and AI systems be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See M. Stelmaszak, et al., &amp;quot;Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human-Algorithm Relations&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Journal of Management Studies&#039;&#039;, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 2. What do IQ tests measure?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-do-IQ-tests-2022 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human and animal intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyeAbcDDgg Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/file/1889978901204?v=Territoriality Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Readings:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Linda S. Gottfredson. [https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994WSJmainstream.pdf Mainstream Science on Intelligence]. In: &#039;&#039;Intelligence&#039;&#039; 24 (1997), pp. 13–23.&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The context-dependence of human intelligence, and why AGI is impossible&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 3. Affordances, tacit knowledge, cognitive niches, and the background of Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Harry Heft, &#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/shared/static/bbaq21q115pi8xpa5744ku1ftuuj6je0.pdf Ecological Psychology in Context]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/lS4-QSR1sNk?t=791 There&#039;s no &#039;I&#039; in &#039;AI&#039;], Steven Pemberton, Amsterdam, December 12, 2024 &lt;br /&gt;
::1. &#039;&#039;Ersatz&#039;&#039; definitions: using words like &#039;thinks&#039; as in &#039;the machine is thinking&#039;, but with meanings quite different from those we use when talking about human beings. As when we define &#039;flying&#039; as moving through the air, and then jumping up and down and saying &amp;quot;look, I&#039;m flying!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::2. Pareidolia: a psychological phenomenon that causes people to see patterns, objects, or meaning in ambiguous or unrelated stimuli&lt;br /&gt;
::3. If you can&#039;t spot irony, you&#039;re not intelligent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: The Free Will Problem and the Problem of the Machine Will==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computers cannot have a will, because computers &#039;&#039;don&#039;t give a damn&#039;&#039;. Therefore there can be no machine ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather&#039; says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” &#039;&#039;Fortune&#039;&#039;, June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Implications of the absence of a machine will:&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem of the singularity (when machines will take over from humans) will not arise&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality will never be realized [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Digital-Immortality-2023 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:There can be no AI ethics (only: ethics governing human beings when they use AI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the basis of ethics as applied to humans?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALFAI-2 Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;Freedom: An Impossible Reality&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Landgrebe-Ethics Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/EiBBS8ueyz4 Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Utilitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
:Value ethics&lt;br /&gt;
:Responsiblity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No responsibility without objectifying intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On what basis should we build an AI ethics? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On why AI ethics is (a) impossible, (b) unnecessary &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Readings: &lt;br /&gt;
:Moor: [https://philosophynow.org/issues/72/Four_Kinds_of_Ethical_Robots Four kinds of ethical robots]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: No AI Ethics &lt;br /&gt;
:Crane: [https://iai.tv/articles/the-ai-ethics-hoax-auid-1762?_auid=2020 The AI Ethics Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: The Ontology of Consciousness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:John Searle&lt;br /&gt;
::On consciousness: the Chinese Room Argument&lt;br /&gt;
::Searle and Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Neuroscience and consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_being_you_a_new_science_of_consciousness Anil Seth, &#039;&#039;Being You: A New Science of Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02192-y Making AI meaningful again]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALWTM Raymond Tallis, &#039;&#039;Why the Mind is not a Computer&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALTEA Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;The Explicit Animal: A Defence of Human Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Featuring [https://johnbeverley.com/ John Beverley]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transcription-Debate-1 Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debating the following motions: &lt;br /&gt;
:Philosophy is irrelevant to ontology engineering &lt;br /&gt;
::[https://buffalo.box.com/v/use-mention-confusion The use-mention confusion]&lt;br /&gt;
:Mappings merely give extra life to bad ontologies &lt;br /&gt;
:AI fear is justified&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO is too slow to react&lt;br /&gt;
:Knowledge graphs cannot prevent hallucinations&lt;br /&gt;
:There can never be AGI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Strategies for leveraging ontologies and knowledge graphs to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models and address their limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI] with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An introduction to the statistical foundations of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-the-Future Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Statistical-Foundations-of-AI Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The types of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Deterministic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Good old fashioned AI (GOFAI)&lt;br /&gt;
:Basic stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::How regression works&lt;br /&gt;
:Advanced stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Neural networks and deep learning&lt;br /&gt;
:Hybrid&lt;br /&gt;
::Neurosymbolic AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Background reading: &#039;&#039;Why machines will never rule the world&#039;&#039;, 1e chapter 8, 2e chapter 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/UzHTEMxgKEc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Debate2-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Debate2-Transcription Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will combining the semantically rich architectures provided by ontologies and knowledge graphs with the generative strengths of LLMs provide a path towards more explainable artificial intelligence systems, more trustworthy output, and a deeper understanding of vulnerabilities arising from integrated architectures?&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality is idiotic&lt;br /&gt;
:We should allow AI research to proceed unregulated&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if you think AGI is impossible, you should treat robots at certain levels of sophistication as moral agents&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;OWL semantics&#039; have nothing to do with the semantics of ordinary language&lt;br /&gt;
:AI will take away our jobs&lt;br /&gt;
:There will never be driverless cars&lt;br /&gt;
:Science is not ready for software, let alone AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outlines the current landscape of ontology-based AI enhancement strategies, highlighting what goes well and what goes poorly, and why ontology engineering is necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://quantumzeitgeist.com/haghighi-stanford-demonstrates-ontological-bias-in-chatgpt-image-generation-via-root-depiction/ Ontological Assumptions in AI Outputs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==April 1: Deadline for submission to BS of starting drafts for your essays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 2000 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 2000 + 3000 words / 1000 + 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: On Hallucinations and Political Correctness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lecture by [https://x.com/JobstLandgrebe?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Jobst Landgrebe] on Why machines will never stop hallucinating:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Slides-Hallucinating Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In current-day culture, concerns are raised when LLMs responds with symbol or pixel sequences which are seen as deviating from social norms of political correctness or wokeness -- or in other words, when they say the unsayable. Further problems are riased for LLM technology by the inconvenient fact of hallucinations, since this prevents their usage for task automation. LLM architects and engineers try to prevent both types of events. This talk shows why it is impossible to ensure that LLMs do not hallucinate or speak the unspeakable, drawing on arguments from the theory of computation (Turing decision/Rice theorem, Gödel&#039;s First Incompleteness Theorem).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Literature: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10719 Glukhov et. al 2023], LLM Censorship: A Machine Learning Challenge or a Computer Security Problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05746 Banerjee et al. 2024], LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf Apple, The Illusion of Thinking]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: Landgrebe on the Replication Crisis. Jacko on the Ontological Foundations of Proxemics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: &#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Ontological Foundations of Proxemics&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lectuer12-Jacko-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Jacko-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proxemics is the study of spatial behaviour in interpersonal communication. It rests on a set of implicit and explicit assumptions about the nature of space, embodiment, intentionality, and meaning. This presentation aims to articulate these assumptions and outline a conceptual framework for understanding proxemics as an ontologically grounded discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background on the replication crisis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 The replication problems which arise when AI applied in scientific research]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Is Psychology Finished?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1983994242272993592 Bayer tested some findings and only achieved a 21% replication rate for biomedical studies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI]&#039;&#039;, October 2024, with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: Landgrebe on machine intelligence. Jacko on psychopathic AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Why we cannot create intelligence inside a machine&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jobst-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Landgrebe-Limits Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Timothy W. Coleman: Beyond the Limits of AI: Ontology as a Framework for Good System Design (Student presentation)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael Behun III: The Paradox within Artificial Intelligence Development&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Are intelligent machines psychopathic by design?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jacko-Pathology Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two major paradigms in clinical psychology. The first treats mental and personality disorders as disturbances of an inner life: of subjective experience, affect, and self-awareness. This view cannot be meaningfully applied to artificial systems, for which no such subjectivity is given. The second paradigm is behavioural and functional. Here disorders, especially personality disorders, are defined as stable, recurrent patterns of behaviour, cognition, and interpersonal functioning that deviate from expected norms and impair adaptation. Psychopathy in this framework is a cluster of observable traits: persistent violation of social rules, instrumental treatment of others, chronically shallow or incongruent emotional expression, irresponsibility, and a striking absence of anxiety or inhibition in situations that normally elicit it. In this talk I adopt the second, behavioural paradigm and extend it to artificial systems, introducingthe notion of &#039;&#039;&#039;AI quasi-personality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14: Oral presentations (Compulsory for all students)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this class is &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background Material on AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to AI for Philosophers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmiY8_XVvzs Why not robot cops? Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-not-robot-cops Why not robot cops? Slides] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to Philosophy for Computer Scientists&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-is-philosophy Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Crash-Course-Introduction Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.cp.eng.chula.ac.th/~prabhas/teaching/cbs-it-seminar/2012/aiphil-mccarthy.pdf John McCarthy, &amp;quot;What has AI in common with philosophy?&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cosmosandtaxis.org/ct-1256/ Companion volume to &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Interviews_and_podcasts_on_%27%27Why_Machines_Will_Never_Rule_the_World%27%27 Podcasts and interviews on &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Learning Outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Comprehend the Architecture and Operation of Large Language Models: Explain the basic design and functioning of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Define and use correctly key terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Evaluate the Theoretical and Practical Limits of AI: Explain the limitations of AI systems as applications of Turing-computable mathematics. Critically assess claims about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the “singularity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Examine Theories of Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Simulation: Explain why machines lack intentionality and subjective experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Understand Ethical and Normative Dimensions of AI: Explain why AI systems cannot possess will, intention, or moral responsibility, and differentiate between AI ethics and ethics of AI use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Apply Ontology-Based Strategies for AI Enhancement: Explain how ontologies and knowledge graphs can improve the explainability, consistency, and interoperability of AI systems. Identify strengths and weaknesses of ontology-based and neurosymbolic AI approaches.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=188</id>
		<title>Ontology and AI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=188"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T19:07:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;PHI 637 Ontology and AI Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spring 2026 - PHI637SEM-SMI2 - Special Topics: Ontology and Artificial Intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks 1-13 Asynchronous &lt;br /&gt;
Week 14 Synchronous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: [https://ontology.buffalo.edu/Smith Barry Smith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The course program below is divided into numbered weeks. The information for each week begins with links to that week&#039;s main video together with the underlying slides. (Transcriptions of the video will be added in the course of the semester). There is also additional background material which is provided as a starting point for further explorations on the part of each student. You should feel free to ignore those items in this background material which you do not find of interest.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a remote asynchronous course. Student presentations will be scheduled in a synchronous session towards the end of April. Additional, informal synchronous sessions may be organized during the course of the semester. One-on-one sessions with Dr Smith can be organised on request to phismith@buffalo.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get a grade for this class you need to submit to Dr Smith an essay on a topic of your choice relating to the interactions between ontology and AI, with one or other topics documented below as your starting point. On or before March 1 you should send an email to Dr Smith with a one-paragraph outline of your topic. Feel free to contact Dr Smith if you are unsure of what your topic should be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All enrolled students must email to BS a Starting Draft version of their essay by April 1 at the latest. Further drafts may be needed in response to Dr Smith&#039;s editorial comments. Students must submit a final, full version of their essay and of the associated powerpoint deck by May 1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Essay word length requirements are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 2500 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 2500 + 3500 words / starting draft: 1000 + 1000 words &lt;br /&gt;
:Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / starting draft: 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3-credit-hour students may submit one single essay with the corresponding combined word count.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grading will be assigned according to the following division:&lt;br /&gt;
:Essay(s): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Presentation (and accompanying powerpoint deck): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Class Participation (responses to presentations): 20%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;AI Policy&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The starting draft of your essay, to be submitted to BS on or before April 1, should be your own work. This means no use of LLMs. All students are, however, welcome thereafter to use LLMs on polishing their starting drafts, providing that they follow these rules: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 1: Include a declaration on p. 1 to the effect that the essay was written entirely without any sort of AI assistance. I reserve the right to use software tools, but also my own judgment, to ensure this draft was written by you. Grades under option 1. will be determined by the quality of your essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 2 is in multiple steps:&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 1. Create a draft in your own words of an essay that is about half as long as your target length. This should be a substantive draft, but it can contain for example rough notes pointing to further lines of development. Not only this initial draft, but also all further steps in the list below, should rely on study by you of the relevant literature. Both your draft and your final essay should accordingly contain lists of references.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 2. Submit this draft to me at phismith@buffalo.edu by the middle of the semester.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 3. You create a new prompt using your draft as an attachment with an instruction such as: &#039;&#039;show me how I can improve the attached&#039;&#039;. This will start a potentially long process of improvements in your essay incorporating further contributions from you together with assistance from the LLM. You should attempt to use prompts to manipulate the style of the LLM output in a direction of a style appropriate to serious academic research, with references, quotations, definitions, as needed. Most importantly: you should be aware that LLMs often make errors (called &#039;hallucinations&#039;), for example inventing references in the literature which do not in fact exist.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 4. the LLM has been keeping track of everything you tell it to do since you started the newchat. When you think you might be ready to submit, use the LLM save function to generate a URI linking to all the interactions thus far – effectively a log of your process. This log, together with your initial and final essay will form part of what will be evaluated for your grade.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 5. When you truly are ready to submit, press save for one last time and take a note of the link; send me this link, together with your completed essay, and with any notes on features of the log you which to point out -- for example requests that I ignore specific chains of prompts because they proved to be dead ends.&lt;br /&gt;
Grades under Option 2 will be determined on the basis of (a) originality of the initial draft, (b) creativity of your prompts, (c) quality of final essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at the synchronous session featuring student presentations around May 1 is compulsory for all students&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology (also called &#039;metaphysics&#039;) is a subfield of philosophy which aims to establich the kinds of entities in the world -- including both the material and the mental world -- and the relations between them. Applied ontology applies philosophical ideas and methods to support those who are collecting, using, comparing, refining, evaluating or (today above all) generating data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as &#039;intelligent&#039;. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create what is called &#039;&#039;General Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039; (AGI), by which is meant an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being. ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) attempt to generate data from other data, where the latter are obtained for example by crawling the internet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Required reading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-machines-1e Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]&#039;&#039; (Routledge 2022; revised and enlarged second edition, published in 2025), [https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9939883749704803&amp;amp;context=L&amp;amp;vid=01SUNY_BUF:everything&amp;amp;lang=en&amp;amp;search_scope=UBSUNY&amp;amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;amp;tab=EverythingUBSUNY&amp;amp;query=any,contains,jobst%20landgrebe available online from UB Library] . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also offer [https://www.routledge.com/Why-Machines-Will-Never-Rule-the-World-Artificial-Intelligence-without-Fear/Landgrebe-Smith/p/book/9781032941400?srsltid=AfmBOoor0YJakTv88G0LUq0tWvBh3YS604AK0Gfr8Bd0YYgsgq1U6J7y here] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: The Glory and the Misery of Large Language Models==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: A brief introduction to Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. Focusing on booth positive and negative aspects of how they work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMD_1yA3TXk Video1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Glory-and-Misery Slides1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/s/ufnf1gwozzzd3hpmcmmbz2j7l0dzht56 Transcript]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2: GPT-5 and the French and Indian War: Teach yourself history with ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm4mCgAsI6I Video2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/French-and-Indian-War Slides2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions to ponder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What does &#039;stochastic&#039; mean in &#039;stochastic AI&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is &#039;scaling&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are hallucinations?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Good Old Fashioned (Logical, Symbolic) AI to ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/B4L27eavNT4 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Slides-Lecture-2 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its inception in the last century, AI has enjoyed repeated cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment (AI summers and winters). Recent successes of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened a new era of popularization of AI. For the first time, AI tools have been created that are immediately available to the wider population, who for the first time can have real hands-on experience of what AI can do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this first lecture we will address the origins of AI in Stanford University in the 1970s and &#039;80s, and specifically in the work on common-sense ontology of Patrick Hayes and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics to be dealt with include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is ontology?&lt;br /&gt;
:From Aristotle to 20th century philosophical ontology&lt;br /&gt;
:Patrick Hayes, Naive Physics and ontology-based robotics&lt;br /&gt;
:Doug Lennat and the CYC (for &#039;enCYClopedia&#039; project)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why CYC failed&lt;br /&gt;
:Why ontology is still important to AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/History-of-AI History of AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://utt.hal.science/hal-02954862v1/document Where do ontologies come from?]&lt;br /&gt;
:See also references to Hayes in [https://www.physicalism.com/osr.pdf &#039;&#039;Everything must go&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: Limits of AI? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Video3 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Slides3 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Surveys the technical fundamentals of AI: Methods, mathematics, usage &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Natural and engineered systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The ontology of systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Complex systems &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The limits of Turing machines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Why AI cannot model complex systems adequately and synoptically, and why they therefore cannot reach a level of intelligence equal to that of human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusions: &lt;br /&gt;
:AI is a family of algorithms to automate repetitive events&lt;br /&gt;
:Deep neural networks have nothing to do with neurons&lt;br /&gt;
:AI is not artificial &#039;intelligence&#039;; it is a branch of mathematics in which the attempt is made to use the Turing machine to its limits by using gigantically large amounts of data&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/opinion/ai-gpt5-rethinking.html?unlocked_article_code=1.jE8.eAwg.I1yx07GQmDbh&amp;amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;amp;referringSource=articleShare&amp;amp;utm_source=substack&amp;amp;utm_medium=email Marcus on superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:https://www.wheresyoured.at/&lt;br /&gt;
:https://x.com/jobstlandgrebe?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
:https://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Ecological Psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jobst Landgrebe on mathematical definitions of consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Surveys the spectrum of transhumanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Debunks the feasibility of radically improving human beings via technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Explains why Sam Altman and other AI gods are so passionate about creating Artificial General Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. J. J. Gibson, direct realism, and how our behavior is tuned to affordances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-acronym-behind-our-wildest-ai-dreams-and-nightmares/ TESCREALISM]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Mind-Body Transhumanism and the Mind-Body Problem]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AI and the meaning of life:&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf There is no general AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Lugano-2025 Landgrebe on Transhumanism]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://michaelnotebook.com/xriskbrief/index.html Considering the existential risk of Artificial Superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology of the Eruv (why it would take all the fun out of real estate if everyone could live next door to John Lennon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we living in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:David Chalmers&#039; &#039;&#039;[https://www.amazon.com/Reality-Virtual-Worlds-Problems-Philosophy/dp/0393635805 Reality+]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Intelligence-Lugano-2025 Are we living in a simulation?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Living-in-a-Simulation On Chalmers on &#039;&#039;Reality&#039;&#039;+?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-in-the-Future The Future of Artificial Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine consciousness: Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are &#039;&#039;about&#039;&#039; something.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Lugano-Machine-Will Slides] / :[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Machine-Consciousness-BS-2025 Video]: Can a machine be conscious?&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt-JzB50sJE Searle&#039;s Chinese Room Argument]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs] &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918 Making AI Meaningful Again]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1258.pdf Søgaard: Do Language Models Have Semantics?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16582 Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for Classifying Objections and Constraints]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: AGI, Behavior Settings and Distributed Cognition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Niches Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Question-and-answer session with Jérémy Ravenel of [https://home.naas.ai naas.ai]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions addressed include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are you doing with BFO and LLMs? &lt;br /&gt;
:Can you rely on BFO still being operative in the proper way even after a new release of an LLM?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeremyravenel_why-is-bfo-so-powerful-bfo-basic-formal-activity-7250607560976732163-d7tZ/ Why is BFO so powerful?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-Creativity Explicit, implicit, practical, personal and tacit knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Practical-knowledge Personal knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==March 1: Submit to Dr Smith a one-paragraph description of the topic of your essay==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: Towards a theory of intelligence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/ontology-and-AI-slides-6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture6-AI-Ontology Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Definitions of intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. the ability to adapt to new situations (applies both to humans and to animals) &lt;br /&gt;
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Ryan Muldoon, &amp;quot;Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Philosophy Compass&#039;&#039; 8 (2):117-125 (2013) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team made of humans and AI systems be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See M. Stelmaszak, et al., &amp;quot;Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human-Algorithm Relations&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Journal of Management Studies&#039;&#039;, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 2. What do IQ tests measure?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-do-IQ-tests-2022 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human and animal intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyeAbcDDgg Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/file/1889978901204?v=Territoriality Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Readings:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Linda S. Gottfredson. [https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994WSJmainstream.pdf Mainstream Science on Intelligence]. In: &#039;&#039;Intelligence&#039;&#039; 24 (1997), pp. 13–23.&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The context-dependence of human intelligence, and why AGI is impossible&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 3. Affordances, tacit knowledge, cognitive niches, and the background of Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Harry Heft, &#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/shared/static/bbaq21q115pi8xpa5744ku1ftuuj6je0.pdf Ecological Psychology in Context]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/lS4-QSR1sNk?t=791 There&#039;s no &#039;I&#039; in &#039;AI&#039;], Steven Pemberton, Amsterdam, December 12, 2024 &lt;br /&gt;
::1. &#039;&#039;Ersatz&#039;&#039; definitions: using words like &#039;thinks&#039; as in &#039;the machine is thinking&#039;, but with meanings quite different from those we use when talking about human beings. As when we define &#039;flying&#039; as moving through the air, and then jumping up and down and saying &amp;quot;look, I&#039;m flying!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::2. Pareidolia: a psychological phenomenon that causes people to see patterns, objects, or meaning in ambiguous or unrelated stimuli&lt;br /&gt;
::3. If you can&#039;t spot irony, you&#039;re not intelligent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: The Free Will Problem and the Problem of the Machine Will==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computers cannot have a will, because computers &#039;&#039;don&#039;t give a damn&#039;&#039;. Therefore there can be no machine ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather&#039; says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” &#039;&#039;Fortune&#039;&#039;, June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Implications of the absence of a machine will:&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem of the singularity (when machines will take over from humans) will not arise&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality will never be realized [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Digital-Immortality-2023 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:There can be no AI ethics (only: ethics governing human beings when they use AI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the basis of ethics as applied to humans?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALFAI-2 Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;Freedom: An Impossible Reality&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Landgrebe-Ethics Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/EiBBS8ueyz4 Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Utilitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
:Value ethics&lt;br /&gt;
:Responsiblity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No responsibility without objectifying intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On what basis should we build an AI ethics? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On why AI ethics is (a) impossible, (b) unnecessary &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Readings: &lt;br /&gt;
:Moor: [https://philosophynow.org/issues/72/Four_Kinds_of_Ethical_Robots Four kinds of ethical robots]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: No AI Ethics &lt;br /&gt;
:Crane: [https://iai.tv/articles/the-ai-ethics-hoax-auid-1762?_auid=2020 The AI Ethics Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: The Ontology of Consciousness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:John Searle&lt;br /&gt;
::On consciousness: the Chinese Room Argument&lt;br /&gt;
::Searle and Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Neuroscience and consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_being_you_a_new_science_of_consciousness Anil Seth, &#039;&#039;Being You: A New Science of Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02192-y Making AI meaningful again]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALWTM Raymond Tallis, &#039;&#039;Why the Mind is not a Computer&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALTEA Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;The Explicit Animal: A Defence of Human Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Featuring [https://johnbeverley.com/ John Beverley]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transcription-Debate-1 Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debating the following motions: &lt;br /&gt;
:Philosophy is irrelevant to ontology engineering &lt;br /&gt;
::[https://buffalo.box.com/v/use-mention-confusion The use-mention confusion]&lt;br /&gt;
:Mappings merely give extra life to bad ontologies &lt;br /&gt;
:AI fear is justified&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO is too slow to react&lt;br /&gt;
:Knowledge graphs cannot prevent hallucinations&lt;br /&gt;
:There can never be AGI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Strategies for leveraging ontologies and knowledge graphs to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models and address their limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI] with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An introduction to the statistical foundations of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-the-Future Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Statistical-Foundations-of-AI Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The types of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Deterministic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Good old fashioned AI (GOFAI)&lt;br /&gt;
:Basic stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::How regression works&lt;br /&gt;
:Advanced stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Neural networks and deep learning&lt;br /&gt;
:Hybrid&lt;br /&gt;
::Neurosymbolic AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Background reading: &#039;&#039;Why machines will never rule the world&#039;&#039;, 1e chapter 8, 2e chapter 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/UzHTEMxgKEc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture10Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Debate2-Transcription Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will combining the semantically rich architectures provided by ontologies and knowledge graphs with the generative strengths of LLMs provide a path towards more explainable artificial intelligence systems, more trustworthy output, and a deeper understanding of vulnerabilities arising from integrated architectures?&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality is idiotic&lt;br /&gt;
:We should allow AI research to proceed unregulated&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if you think AGI is impossible, you should treat robots at certain levels of sophistication as moral agents&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;OWL semantics&#039; have nothing to do with the semantics of ordinary language&lt;br /&gt;
:AI will take away our jobs&lt;br /&gt;
:There will never be driverless cars&lt;br /&gt;
:Science is not ready for software, let alone AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outlines the current landscape of ontology-based AI enhancement strategies, highlighting what goes well and what goes poorly, and why ontology engineering is necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://quantumzeitgeist.com/haghighi-stanford-demonstrates-ontological-bias-in-chatgpt-image-generation-via-root-depiction/ Ontological Assumptions in AI Outputs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==April 1: Deadline for submission to BS of starting drafts for your essays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 2000 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 2000 + 3000 words / 1000 + 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: On Hallucinations and Political Correctness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lecture by [https://x.com/JobstLandgrebe?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Jobst Landgrebe] on Why machines will never stop hallucinating:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Slides-Hallucinating Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In current-day culture, concerns are raised when LLMs responds with symbol or pixel sequences which are seen as deviating from social norms of political correctness or wokeness -- or in other words, when they say the unsayable. Further problems are riased for LLM technology by the inconvenient fact of hallucinations, since this prevents their usage for task automation. LLM architects and engineers try to prevent both types of events. This talk shows why it is impossible to ensure that LLMs do not hallucinate or speak the unspeakable, drawing on arguments from the theory of computation (Turing decision/Rice theorem, Gödel&#039;s First Incompleteness Theorem).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Literature: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10719 Glukhov et. al 2023], LLM Censorship: A Machine Learning Challenge or a Computer Security Problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05746 Banerjee et al. 2024], LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf Apple, The Illusion of Thinking]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: Landgrebe on the Replication Crisis. Jacko on the Ontological Foundations of Proxemics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: &#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Ontological Foundations of Proxemics&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lectuer12-Jacko-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Jacko-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proxemics is the study of spatial behaviour in interpersonal communication. It rests on a set of implicit and explicit assumptions about the nature of space, embodiment, intentionality, and meaning. This presentation aims to articulate these assumptions and outline a conceptual framework for understanding proxemics as an ontologically grounded discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background on the replication crisis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 The replication problems which arise when AI applied in scientific research]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Is Psychology Finished?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1983994242272993592 Bayer tested some findings and only achieved a 21% replication rate for biomedical studies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI]&#039;&#039;, October 2024, with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: Landgrebe on machine intelligence. Jacko on psychopathic AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Why we cannot create intelligence inside a machine&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jobst-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Landgrebe-Limits Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Timothy W. Coleman: Beyond the Limits of AI: Ontology as a Framework for Good System Design (Student presentation)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael Behun III: The Paradox within Artificial Intelligence Development&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Are intelligent machines psychopathic by design?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jacko-Pathology Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two major paradigms in clinical psychology. The first treats mental and personality disorders as disturbances of an inner life: of subjective experience, affect, and self-awareness. This view cannot be meaningfully applied to artificial systems, for which no such subjectivity is given. The second paradigm is behavioural and functional. Here disorders, especially personality disorders, are defined as stable, recurrent patterns of behaviour, cognition, and interpersonal functioning that deviate from expected norms and impair adaptation. Psychopathy in this framework is a cluster of observable traits: persistent violation of social rules, instrumental treatment of others, chronically shallow or incongruent emotional expression, irresponsibility, and a striking absence of anxiety or inhibition in situations that normally elicit it. In this talk I adopt the second, behavioural paradigm and extend it to artificial systems, introducingthe notion of &#039;&#039;&#039;AI quasi-personality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14: Oral presentations (Compulsory for all students)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this class is &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background Material on AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to AI for Philosophers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmiY8_XVvzs Why not robot cops? Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-not-robot-cops Why not robot cops? Slides] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to Philosophy for Computer Scientists&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-is-philosophy Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Crash-Course-Introduction Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.cp.eng.chula.ac.th/~prabhas/teaching/cbs-it-seminar/2012/aiphil-mccarthy.pdf John McCarthy, &amp;quot;What has AI in common with philosophy?&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cosmosandtaxis.org/ct-1256/ Companion volume to &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Interviews_and_podcasts_on_%27%27Why_Machines_Will_Never_Rule_the_World%27%27 Podcasts and interviews on &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Learning Outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Comprehend the Architecture and Operation of Large Language Models: Explain the basic design and functioning of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Define and use correctly key terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Evaluate the Theoretical and Practical Limits of AI: Explain the limitations of AI systems as applications of Turing-computable mathematics. Critically assess claims about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the “singularity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Examine Theories of Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Simulation: Explain why machines lack intentionality and subjective experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Understand Ethical and Normative Dimensions of AI: Explain why AI systems cannot possess will, intention, or moral responsibility, and differentiate between AI ethics and ethics of AI use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Apply Ontology-Based Strategies for AI Enhancement: Explain how ontologies and knowledge graphs can improve the explainability, consistency, and interoperability of AI systems. Identify strengths and weaknesses of ontology-based and neurosymbolic AI approaches.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=187</id>
		<title>Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=187"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T15:21:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PHI 601 Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective - Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Registration number 23606&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructor: [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Office hours&#039;&#039;&#039;: By appointment via email to [mailto:phismith@buffalo.edu]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The Course&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course is a 1 credit-hour asynchronous online course for masters-level students and advanced undergraduates. No background in philosophy or ontology is presupposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It provides an introduction to central themes in the history of philosophy viewed from an ontological perspective. The course is designed to be of interest to both philosophers and those with a background in computer and information science. Topics treated will include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- brief history of ontology from Aristotle to the Human Genome Project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the meaning of life&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the ontology of social reality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- ontology leaving the mother ship of philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- why computer science needs philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the Semantic Web&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- towards a standard top-level ontology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- ontology and the Federal Government Data Integration Initiative (anno 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTjov-UhEW7N145LVBPrRYLZ Course content, which consists of 8 lectures, can be found here].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Student Learning Outcomes&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
          &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Program Outcomes/Competencies  &lt;br /&gt;
! Instructional Method(s)&lt;br /&gt;
! Assessment Method(s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire a beginner&#039;s knowledge of philosophy that will introduce him or her to more technical aspects of the discipline in subsequent semesters.  &lt;br /&gt;
| Lectures and class discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
| Assessment of questions submitted at the end of the lectures.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire experience in using one principal philosophical method, namely: analysing arguments and formulating relevant questions for which answers have not been provided in the course of the lectures.&lt;br /&gt;
| The student is required to submit written questions for each of the 8 lectures making up the course.&lt;br /&gt;
| Review of questions for relevance and originality.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire experience in using a second principal philosophical method, namely: taking an active part in oral arguments.&lt;br /&gt;
| Performance in the final -- synchronous -- session of the course, active participation in which is compulsory.&lt;br /&gt;
| Review of active participation by student.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Grading for the course will take the following form. For each of the 8 lectures the student is required to prepare a single question relating to the content of that lecture. It should be such that an answer to the question is not provided in the lecture. It should also be of general interest to the other students taking the course. After digesting the content of all lectures the student should send a list of 8 questions to phismith@buffalo.edu with the subject heading &amp;quot;8 Questions&amp;quot;. After receiving emails of this form from all students enrolled in the class, &#039;&#039;&#039;and not later than April 15&#039;&#039;&#039;, one or more zoom meetings will be organized at which students will be required to engage in arguments pertaining to a subset of these questions. Participation in these zoom meeting is required by all class participants, and class contributions will be part of the grade for the course. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The final grade will be calculated on the basis of: &lt;br /&gt;
:1. quality of questions, measured in terms of interestingness, clarity, and relevance to the course&lt;br /&gt;
:2. completeness of the list of questions received&lt;br /&gt;
:3. quality of contributions to the final synchronous meeting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A video recording of Dr Smith&#039;s answers to representative questions is available [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Questions-on-ontology here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For further information please contact Dr Smith at phismith@buffalo.edu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grade Quality Percentage&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class = wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
|  A	|| 4.0	|| 90.0% -100.00%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| A-	|| 3.67	|| 87.0% - 89.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B+	|| 3.33	|| 84.0% - 86.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B	|| 3.00	|| 80.0% - 83.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B-	|| 2.67	|| 77.0% - 79.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C+	|| 2.33	|| 74.0% - 76.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C	|| 2.00	|| 71.0% - 73.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C-	|| 1.67	|| 68.0% - 70.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| D+	|| 1.33	|| 65.0% - 67.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| D	|| 1.00	|| 62.0% - 64.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| F	|| 0	|| 61.9% or below&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interim grade of Incomplete (I) may be assigned if the student has completed some but not all requirements for the course. The default grade accompanying an interim grade of &#039;I&#039; shall be &#039;U&#039; and will be displayed on the UB record as &#039;IU.&#039; The default Unsatisfactory (U) grade shall become the permanent course grade of record if the &#039;IU&#039; is not changed through formal notice by the instructor upon the student&#039;s completion of the course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assignment of an interim &#039;IU&#039; is at the discretion of the instructor. A grade of &#039;IU&#039; can be assigned only if successful completion of unfulfilled course requirements can result in a final grade better than the default &#039;U&#039; grade. The student should have a passing average in the requirements already completed. The instructor shall provide the student specification, in writing, of the requirements to be fulfilled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related Policies and Services&lt;br /&gt;
Academic integrity is a fundamental university value. Through the honest completion of academic work, students sustain the integrity of the university while facilitating the university&#039;s imperative for the transmission of knowledge and culture based upon the generation of new and innovative ideas. See http://grad.buffalo.edu/Academics/Policies-Procedures/Academic-Integrity.html.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accessibility resources: If you have any disability which requires reasonable accommodations to enable you to participate in this course, please contact the Office of Accessibility Resources in 60 Capen Hall, 645-2608 and also the instructor of this course during the first week of class. The office will provide you with information and review appropriate arrangements for reasonable accommodations, which can be found on the web here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
University suppert services: Students are often unaware of university support services. For example, the Center for Excellence in Writing provides support for written work, and several tutoring centers on campus provide academic success support and resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Available resources on sexual assault: UB is committed to providing an environment free of all forms of discrimination and sexual harassment, including sexual assault, domestic and dating violence and stalking. If you have experienced gender-based violence (intimate partner violence, attempted or completed sexual assault, harassment, coercion, stalking, etc.), UB has resources to help. This includes academic accommodations, health and counseling services, housing accommodations, helping with legal protective orders, and assistance with reporting the incident to police or other UB officials if you so choose. Please contact UB’s Title IX Coordinator at 716-645-2266 for more information. For confidential assistance, you may also contact a Crisis Services Campus Advocate at 716-796-4399.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Counselling services: As a student you may experience a range of issues that can cause barriers to learning or reduce your ability to participate in daily activities. These might include strained relationships, anxiety, high levels of stress, alcohol/drug problems, feeling down, health concerns, or unwanted sexual experiences. Counseling, Health Services, and Health Promotion are here to help with these or other concerns. You learn can more about these programs and services by contacting:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Counseling Services: 120 Richmond Quad (North Campus), phone 716-645-2720&lt;br /&gt;
:Health Services: Michael Hall (South Campus), phone: 716-829-3316&lt;br /&gt;
:Health Promotion: 114 Student Union (North Campus), phone: 716- 645-2837&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended reading&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Marjorie Grene, &#039;&#039;A Portrait of Aristotle&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:R. Arp, B. Smith, A. D. Spear, &#039;&#039;[https://mitpress.mit.edu/index.php?q=books/building-ontologies-basic-formal-ontology Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:John R. Searle, &#039;&#039;Making the Social World&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:E. J. Lowe, &#039;&#039;The Four Category Ontology&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Roman Ingarden, &#039;&#039;The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Language&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=186</id>
		<title>Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=186"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T15:21:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: Created page with &amp;quot;PHI 601 Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective - Spring 2026   Registration number 23606  Instructor: [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith]   &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Office hours&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: By appointment via email to [mailto:phismith@buffalo.edu]  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Course&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  This course is a 1 credit-hour asynchronous online course for masters-level students and advanced undergraduates. No background in philosophy or ontology is presupposed.  It provides an introduction to cent...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PHI 601 Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective - Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Registration number 23606&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructor: [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Office hours&#039;&#039;&#039;: By appointment via email to [mailto:phismith@buffalo.edu]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The Course&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course is a 1 credit-hour asynchronous online course for masters-level students and advanced undergraduates. No background in philosophy or ontology is presupposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It provides an introduction to central themes in the history of philosophy viewed from an ontological perspective. The course is designed to be of interest to both philosophers and those with a background in computer and information science. Topics treated will include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- brief history of ontology from Aristotle to the Human Genome Project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the meaning of life&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the ontology of social reality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- ontology leaving the mother ship of philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- why computer science needs philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the Semantic Web&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- towards a standard top-level ontology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- ontology and the Federal Government Data Integration Initiative (anno 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTjov-UhEW7N145LVBPrRYLZ Course content, which consists of 8 lectures, can be found here].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Student Learning Outcomes&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
          &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Program Outcomes/Competencies  &lt;br /&gt;
! Instructional Method(s)&lt;br /&gt;
! Assessment Method(s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire a beginner&#039;s knowledge of philosophy that will introduce him or her to more technical aspects of the discipline in subsequent semesters.  &lt;br /&gt;
| Lectures and class discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
| Assessment of questions submitted at the end of the lectures.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire experience in using one principal philosophical method, namely: analysing arguments and formulating relevant questions for which answers have not been provided in the course of the lectures.&lt;br /&gt;
| The student is required to submit written questions for each of the 8 lectures making up the course.&lt;br /&gt;
| Review of questions for relevance and originality.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire experience in using a second principal philosophical method, namely: taking an active part in oral arguments.&lt;br /&gt;
| Performance in the final -- synchronous -- session of the course, active participation in which is compulsory.&lt;br /&gt;
| Review of active participation by student.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Grading for the course will take the following form. For each of the 8 lectures the student is required to prepare a single question relating to the content of that lecture. It should be such that an answer to the question is not provided in the lecture. It should also be of general interest to the other students taking the course. After digesting the content of all lectures the student should send a list of 8 questions to phismith@buffalo.edu with the subject heading &amp;quot;8 Questions&amp;quot;. After receiving emails of this form from all students enrolled in the class, &#039;&#039;&#039;and not later than April 15&#039;&#039;&#039;, one or more zoom meetings will be organized at which students will be required to engage in arguments pertaining to a subset of these questions. Participation in these zoom meeting is required by all class participants, and class contributions will be part of the grade for the course. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The final grade will be calculated on the basis of: &lt;br /&gt;
:1. quality of questions, measured in terms of interestingness, clarity, and relevance to the course&lt;br /&gt;
:2. completeness of the list of questions received&lt;br /&gt;
:3. quality of contributions to the final synchronous meeting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A video recording of Dr Smith&#039;s answers to representative questions is available [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Questions-on-ontology here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For further information please contact Dr Smith at phismith@buffalo.edu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grade Quality Percentage&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class = wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
|  A	|| 4.0	|| 90.0% -100.00%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| A-	|| 3.67	|| 87.0% - 89.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B+	|| 3.33	|| 84.0% - 86.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B	|| 3.00	|| 80.0% - 83.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B-	|| 2.67	|| 77.0% - 79.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C+	|| 2.33	|| 74.0% - 76.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C	|| 2.00	|| 71.0% - 73.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C-	|| 1.67	|| 68.0% - 70.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| D+	|| 1.33	|| 65.0% - 67.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| D	|| 1.00	|| 62.0% - 64.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| F	|| 0	|| 61.9% or below&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interim grade of Incomplete (I) may be assigned if the student has completed some but not all requirements for the course. The default grade accompanying an interim grade of &#039;I&#039; shall be &#039;U&#039; and will be displayed on the UB record as &#039;IU.&#039; The default Unsatisfactory (U) grade shall become the permanent course grade of record if the &#039;IU&#039; is not changed through formal notice by the instructor upon the student&#039;s completion of the course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assignment of an interim &#039;IU&#039; is at the discretion of the instructor. A grade of &#039;IU&#039; can be assigned only if successful completion of unfulfilled course requirements can result in a final grade better than the default &#039;U&#039; grade. The student should have a passing average in the requirements already completed. The instructor shall provide the student specification, in writing, of the requirements to be fulfilled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related Policies and Services&lt;br /&gt;
Academic integrity is a fundamental university value. Through the honest completion of academic work, students sustain the integrity of the university while facilitating the university&#039;s imperative for the transmission of knowledge and culture based upon the generation of new and innovative ideas. See http://grad.buffalo.edu/Academics/Policies-Procedures/Academic-Integrity.html.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accessibility resources: If you have any disability which requires reasonable accommodations to enable you to participate in this course, please contact the Office of Accessibility Resources in 60 Capen Hall, 645-2608 and also the instructor of this course during the first week of class. The office will provide you with information and review appropriate arrangements for reasonable accommodations, which can be found on the web here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
University suppert services: Students are often unaware of university support services. For example, the Center for Excellence in Writing provides support for written work, and several tutoring centers on campus provide academic success support and resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Available resources on sexual assault: UB is committed to providing an environment free of all forms of discrimination and sexual harassment, including sexual assault, domestic and dating violence and stalking. If you have experienced gender-based violence (intimate partner violence, attempted or completed sexual assault, harassment, coercion, stalking, etc.), UB has resources to help. This includes academic accommodations, health and counseling services, housing accommodations, helping with legal protective orders, and assistance with reporting the incident to police or other UB officials if you so choose. Please contact UB’s Title IX Coordinator at 716-645-2266 for more information. For confidential assistance, you may also contact a Crisis Services Campus Advocate at 716-796-4399.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Counselling services: As a student you may experience a range of issues that can cause barriers to learning or reduce your ability to participate in daily activities. These might include strained relationships, anxiety, high levels of stress, alcohol/drug problems, feeling down, health concerns, or unwanted sexual experiences. Counseling, Health Services, and Health Promotion are here to help with these or other concerns. You learn can more about these programs and services by contacting:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Counseling Services: 120 Richmond Quad (North Campus), phone 716-645-2720&lt;br /&gt;
:Health Services: Michael Hall (South Campus), phone: 716-829-3316&lt;br /&gt;
:Health Promotion: 114 Student Union (North Campus), phone: 716- 645-2837&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended reading&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Marjorie Grene, &#039;&#039;A Portrait of Aristotle&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:R. Arp, B. Smith, A. D. Spear, &#039;&#039;[https://mitpress.mit.edu/index.php?q=books/building-ontologies-basic-formal-ontology Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:John R. Searle, &#039;&#039;Making the Social World&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:E. J. Lowe, &#039;&#039;The Four Category Ontology&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Roman Ingarden, &#039;&#039;The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Language&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=185</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=185"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T15:20:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These courses are plannned for Fall 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective: Fall 2026]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new course entitled Ontology of Society, focusing on law and organizations, will be organized in Spring 2026.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Basic_Formal_Ontology:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=184</id>
		<title>Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Basic_Formal_Ontology:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=184"/>
		<updated>2026-04-20T17:13:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598 Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fall 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, ASYNCHRONOUS, THREE CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will introduce students to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), a top-level ISO standard ontology framework that serves as a shared, reusable foundation for domain ontologies in biomedical, scientific, industrial and government domains. It will cover the BFO framework&#039;s core distinctions and explore how BFO functions as the upper-level backbone for major ontologies in the Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry, the Industrial Ontologies Foundry (IOF) and the National Security Ontologies Foundry (NSOF). All of these use BFO as a basis for representing real-world domains in a rigorous and interoperable way. It will also address the philosophical underpinnings of BFO&#039;s realist approach, its formal axiomatization in OWL and FOL, and practical skills for building and evaluating ontologies aligned with the BFO hierarchy. In this way it will prepare students to contribute to large-scale, cross-domain knowledge integration projects in science, medicine, and beyond.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The courae will be built around a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition students will be provided with data and documents relating to the uses and the wider reception of BFO. These materials are to be used to prepare an essay, a pointpoint presentation and a youtube vide, addressing issues relating to BFO&#039;s use and reception. Guidance will be provided by Dr Smith in the course of the semester, along with feedback on successive drafts of the paper and presentation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: Inaugural session: Introduction and background==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 BFO Tutorial (2019): A Series of 6 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]&lt;br /&gt;
:How BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight (November 30): Deadline for submission of your essay and powerpoint presentation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 7-8pm First Synchronous Student Presentation Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 15 7-8pm Second Synchronous Student Presentation Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of essay and powerpoint presentation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Basic_Formal_Ontology:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=183</id>
		<title>Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Basic_Formal_Ontology:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=183"/>
		<updated>2026-04-20T17:06:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598 Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fall 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, ASYNCHRONOUS, THREE CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coure will be built around a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition students will be provided with data and documents relating to the uses and the wider reception of BFO. These materials are to be used to prepare an essay, a pointpoint presentation and a youtube vide, addressing issues relating to BFO&#039;s use and reception. Guidance will be provided by Dr Smith in the course of the semester, along with feedback on successive drafts of the paper and presentation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: Inaugural session: Introduction and background==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 BFO Tutorial (2019): A Series of 6 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]&lt;br /&gt;
:How BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight (November 30): Deadline for submission of your essay and powerpoint presentation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 7-8pm First Synchronous Student Presentation Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 15 7-8pm Second Synchronous Student Presentation Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of essay and powerpoint presentation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Basic_Formal_Ontology:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=182</id>
		<title>Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Basic_Formal_Ontology:_Fall_2026&amp;diff=182"/>
		<updated>2026-04-20T15:46:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: Created page with &amp;quot;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology== &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fall 2026&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith  ONLINE, ASYNCHRONOUS, THREE CREDIT COURSE  This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2.   The coure will be built around a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below.   Students will find further treatment of many of the issues addresse...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fall 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, ASYNCHRONOUS, THREE CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coure will be built around a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition students will be provided with data and documents relating to the uses and the wider reception of BFO. These materials are to be used to prepare an essay, a pointpoint presentation and a youtube vide, addressing issues relating to BFO&#039;s use and reception. Guidance will be provided by Dr Smith in the course of the semester, along with feedback on successive drafts of the paper and presentation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: Inaugural session: Introduction and background==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 BFO Tutorial (2019): A Series of 6 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]&lt;br /&gt;
:How BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight (November 30): Deadline for submission of your essay and powerpoint presentation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 7-8pm First Synchronous Student Presentation Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 15 7-8pm Second Synchronous Student Presentation Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of essay and powerpoint presentation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=181</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=181"/>
		<updated>2026-04-20T15:33:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology: Fall 2026]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective&amp;diff=180</id>
		<title>Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective&amp;diff=180"/>
		<updated>2026-03-26T23:31:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PHI 601 Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective - Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Registration number 23606&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructor: [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Office hours&#039;&#039;&#039;: By appointment via email to [mailto:phismith@buffalo.edu]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The Course&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course is a 1 credit-hour asynchronous online course for masters-level students and advanced undergraduates. No background in philosophy or ontology is presupposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It provides an introduction to central themes in the history of philosophy viewed from an ontological perspective. The course is designed to be of interest to both philosophers and those with a background in computer and information science. Topics treated will include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- brief history of ontology from Aristotle to the Human Genome Project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the meaning of life&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the ontology of social reality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- ontology leaving the mother ship of philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- why computer science needs philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the Semantic Web&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- towards a standard top-level ontology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- ontology and the Federal Government Data Integration Initiative (anno 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTjov-UhEW7N145LVBPrRYLZ Course content, which consists of 8 lectures, can be found here].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Student Learning Outcomes&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
          &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Program Outcomes/Competencies  &lt;br /&gt;
! Instructional Method(s)&lt;br /&gt;
! Assessment Method(s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire a beginner&#039;s knowledge of philosophy that will introduce him or her to more technical aspects of the discipline in subsequent semesters.  &lt;br /&gt;
| Lectures and class discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
| Assessment of questions submitted at the end of the lectures.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire experience in using one principal philosophical method, namely: analysing arguments and formulating relevant questions for which answers have not been provided in the course of the lectures.&lt;br /&gt;
| The student is required to submit written questions for each of the 8 lectures making up the course.&lt;br /&gt;
| Review of questions for relevance and originality.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The student will acquire experience in using a second principal philosophical method, namely: taking an active part in oral arguments.&lt;br /&gt;
| Performance in the final -- synchronous -- session of the course, active participation in which is compulsory.&lt;br /&gt;
| Review of active participation by student.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Grading for the course will take the following form. For each of the 8 lectures the student is required to prepare a single question relating to the content of that lecture. It should be such that an answer to the question is not provided in the lecture. It should also be of general interest to the other students taking the course. After digesting the content of all lectures the student should send a list of 8 questions to phismith@buffalo.edu with the subject heading &amp;quot;8 Questions&amp;quot;. After receiving emails of this form from all students enrolled in the class, &#039;&#039;&#039;and not later than April 15&#039;&#039;&#039;, one or more zoom meetings will be organized at which students will be required to engage in arguments pertaining to a subset of these questions. Participation in these zoom meeting is required by all class participants, and class contributions will be part of the grade for the course. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The final grade will be calculated on the basis of: &lt;br /&gt;
:1. quality of questions, measured in terms of interestingness, clarity, and relevance to the course&lt;br /&gt;
:2. completeness of the list of questions received&lt;br /&gt;
:3. quality of contributions to the final synchronous meeting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A video recording of Dr Smith&#039;s answers to representative questions is available [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Questions-on-ontology here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For further information please contact Dr Smith at phismith@buffalo.edu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grade Quality Percentage&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class = wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
|  A	|| 4.0	|| 90.0% -100.00%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| A-	|| 3.67	|| 87.0% - 89.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B+	|| 3.33	|| 84.0% - 86.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B	|| 3.00	|| 80.0% - 83.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| B-	|| 2.67	|| 77.0% - 79.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C+	|| 2.33	|| 74.0% - 76.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C	|| 2.00	|| 71.0% - 73.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| C-	|| 1.67	|| 68.0% - 70.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| D+	|| 1.33	|| 65.0% - 67.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| D	|| 1.00	|| 62.0% - 64.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| F	|| 0	|| 61.9% or below&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interim grade of Incomplete (I) may be assigned if the student has completed some but not all requirements for the course. The default grade accompanying an interim grade of &#039;I&#039; shall be &#039;U&#039; and will be displayed on the UB record as &#039;IU.&#039; The default Unsatisfactory (U) grade shall become the permanent course grade of record if the &#039;IU&#039; is not changed through formal notice by the instructor upon the student&#039;s completion of the course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assignment of an interim &#039;IU&#039; is at the discretion of the instructor. A grade of &#039;IU&#039; can be assigned only if successful completion of unfulfilled course requirements can result in a final grade better than the default &#039;U&#039; grade. The student should have a passing average in the requirements already completed. The instructor shall provide the student specification, in writing, of the requirements to be fulfilled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related Policies and Services&lt;br /&gt;
Academic integrity is a fundamental university value. Through the honest completion of academic work, students sustain the integrity of the university while facilitating the university&#039;s imperative for the transmission of knowledge and culture based upon the generation of new and innovative ideas. See http://grad.buffalo.edu/Academics/Policies-Procedures/Academic-Integrity.html.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accessibility resources: If you have any disability which requires reasonable accommodations to enable you to participate in this course, please contact the Office of Accessibility Resources in 60 Capen Hall, 645-2608 and also the instructor of this course during the first week of class. The office will provide you with information and review appropriate arrangements for reasonable accommodations, which can be found on the web here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
University suppert services: Students are often unaware of university support services. For example, the Center for Excellence in Writing provides support for written work, and several tutoring centers on campus provide academic success support and resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Available resources on sexual assault: UB is committed to providing an environment free of all forms of discrimination and sexual harassment, including sexual assault, domestic and dating violence and stalking. If you have experienced gender-based violence (intimate partner violence, attempted or completed sexual assault, harassment, coercion, stalking, etc.), UB has resources to help. This includes academic accommodations, health and counseling services, housing accommodations, helping with legal protective orders, and assistance with reporting the incident to police or other UB officials if you so choose. Please contact UB’s Title IX Coordinator at 716-645-2266 for more information. For confidential assistance, you may also contact a Crisis Services Campus Advocate at 716-796-4399.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Counselling services: As a student you may experience a range of issues that can cause barriers to learning or reduce your ability to participate in daily activities. These might include strained relationships, anxiety, high levels of stress, alcohol/drug problems, feeling down, health concerns, or unwanted sexual experiences. Counseling, Health Services, and Health Promotion are here to help with these or other concerns. You learn can more about these programs and services by contacting:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Counseling Services: 120 Richmond Quad (North Campus), phone 716-645-2720&lt;br /&gt;
:Health Services: Michael Hall (South Campus), phone: 716-829-3316&lt;br /&gt;
:Health Promotion: 114 Student Union (North Campus), phone: 716- 645-2837&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended reading&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Marjorie Grene, &#039;&#039;A Portrait of Aristotle&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:R. Arp, B. Smith, A. D. Spear, &#039;&#039;[https://mitpress.mit.edu/index.php?q=books/building-ontologies-basic-formal-ontology Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:John R. Searle, &#039;&#039;Making the Social World&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:E. J. Lowe, &#039;&#039;The Four Category Ontology&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Roman Ingarden, &#039;&#039;The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Language&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=179</id>
		<title>Ontology and AI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=179"/>
		<updated>2026-03-24T15:32:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;PHI 637 Ontology and AI Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spring 2026 - PHI637SEM-SMI2 - Special Topics: Ontology and Artificial Intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks 1-13 Asynchronous &lt;br /&gt;
Week 14 Synchronous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: [https://ontology.buffalo.edu/Smith Barry Smith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The course program below is divided into numbered weeks. The information for each week begins with links to that week&#039;s main video together with the underlying slides. (Transcriptions of the video will be added in the course of the semester). There is also additional background material which is provided as a starting point for further explorations on the part of each student. You should feel free to ignore those items in this background material which you do not find of interest.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a remote asynchronous course. Student presentations will be scheduled in a synchronous session towards the end of April. Additional, informal synchronous sessions may be organized during the course of the semester. One-on-one sessions with Dr Smith can be organised on request to phismith@buffalo.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get a grade for this class you need to submit to Dr Smith an essay on a topic of your choice relating to the interactions between ontology and AI, with one or other topics documented below as your starting point. On or before March 1 you should send an email to Dr Smith with a one-paragraph outline of your topic. Feel free to contact Dr Smith if you are unsure of what your topic should be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All enrolled students must email to BS a Starting Draft version of their essay by April 1 at the latest. Further drafts may be needed in response to Dr Smith&#039;s editorial comments. Students must submit a final, full version of their essay and of the associated powerpoint deck by May 1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Essay word length requirements are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 2500 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 2500 + 3500 words / starting draft: 1000 + 1000 words &lt;br /&gt;
:Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / starting draft: 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3-credit-hour students may submit one single essay with the corresponding combined word count.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grading will be assigned according to the following division:&lt;br /&gt;
:Essay(s): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Presentation (and accompanying powerpoint deck): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Class Participation (responses to presentations): 20%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;AI Policy&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The starting draft of your essay, to be submitted to BS on or before April 1, should be your own work. This means no use of LLMs. All students are, however, welcome thereafter to use LLMs on polishing their starting drafts, providing that they follow these rules: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 1: Include a declaration on p. 1 to the effect that the essay was written entirely without any sort of AI assistance. I reserve the right to use software tools, but also my own judgment, to ensure this draft was written by you. Grades under option 1. will be determined by the quality of your essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 2 is in multiple steps:&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 1. Create a draft in your own words of an essay that is about half as long as your target length. This should be a substantive draft, but it can contain for example rough notes pointing to further lines of development. Not only this initial draft, but also all further steps in the list below, should rely on study by you of the relevant literature. Both your draft and your final essay should accordingly contain lists of references.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 2. Submit this draft to me at phismith@buffalo.edu by the middle of the semester.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 3. You create a new prompt using your draft as an attachment with an instruction such as: &#039;&#039;show me how I can improve the attached&#039;&#039;. This will start a potentially long process of improvements in your essay incorporating further contributions from you together with assistance from the LLM. You should attempt to use prompts to manipulate the style of the LLM output in a direction of a style appropriate to serious academic research, with references, quotations, definitions, as needed. Most importantly: you should be aware that LLMs often make errors (called &#039;hallucinations&#039;), for example inventing references in the literature which do not in fact exist.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 4. the LLM has been keeping track of everything you tell it to do since you started the newchat. When you think you might be ready to submit, use the LLM save function to generate a URI linking to all the interactions thus far – effectively a log of your process. This log, together with your initial and final essay will form part of what will be evaluated for your grade.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 5. When you truly are ready to submit, press save for one last time and take a note of the link; send me this link, together with your completed essay, and with any notes on features of the log you which to point out -- for example requests that I ignore specific chains of prompts because they proved to be dead ends.&lt;br /&gt;
Grades under Option 2 will be determined on the basis of (a) originality of the initial draft, (b) creativity of your prompts, (c) quality of final essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at the synchronous session featuring student presentations around May 1 is compulsory for all students&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology (also called &#039;metaphysics&#039;) is a subfield of philosophy which aims to establich the kinds of entities in the world -- including both the material and the mental world -- and the relations between them. Applied ontology applies philosophical ideas and methods to support those who are collecting, using, comparing, refining, evaluating or (today above all) generating data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as &#039;intelligent&#039;. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create what is called &#039;&#039;General Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039; (AGI), by which is meant an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being. ChatGT and other large language models (LLMs) attempt to generate data from other data, where the latter are obtained for example by crawling the internet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Required reading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-machines-1e Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]&#039;&#039; (Routledge 2022; revised and enlarged second edition, published in 2025), [https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9939883749704803&amp;amp;context=L&amp;amp;vid=01SUNY_BUF:everything&amp;amp;lang=en&amp;amp;search_scope=UBSUNY&amp;amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;amp;tab=EverythingUBSUNY&amp;amp;query=any,contains,jobst%20landgrebe available online from UB Library] . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also offer [https://www.routledge.com/Why-Machines-Will-Never-Rule-the-World-Artificial-Intelligence-without-Fear/Landgrebe-Smith/p/book/9781032941400?srsltid=AfmBOoor0YJakTv88G0LUq0tWvBh3YS604AK0Gfr8Bd0YYgsgq1U6J7y here] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: The Glory and the Misery of Large Language Models==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: A brief introduction to Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. Focusing on booth positive and negative aspects of how they work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMD_1yA3TXk Video1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Glory-and-Misery Slides1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/s/ufnf1gwozzzd3hpmcmmbz2j7l0dzht56 Transcript]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2: GPT-5 and the French and Indian War: Teach yourself history with ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm4mCgAsI6I Video2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/French-and-Indian-War Slides2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions to ponder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What does &#039;stochastic&#039; mean in &#039;stochastic AI&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is &#039;scaling&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are hallucinations?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Good Old Fashioned (Logical, Symbolic) AI to ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/B4L27eavNT4 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Slides-Lecture-2 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its inception in the last century, AI has enjoyed repeated cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment (AI summers and winters). Recent successes of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened a new era of popularization of AI. For the first time, AI tools have been created that are immediately available to the wider population, who for the first time can have real hands-on experience of what AI can do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this first lecture we will address the origins of AI in Stanford University in the 1970s and &#039;80s, and specifically in the work on common-sense ontology of Patrick Hayes and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics to be dealt with include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is ontology?&lt;br /&gt;
:From Aristotle to 20th century philosophical ontology&lt;br /&gt;
:Patrick Hayes, Naive Physics and ontology-based robotics&lt;br /&gt;
:Doug Lennat and the CYC (for &#039;enCYClopedia&#039; project)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why CYC failed&lt;br /&gt;
:Why ontology is still important to AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/History-of-AI History of AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://utt.hal.science/hal-02954862v1/document Where do ontologies come from?]&lt;br /&gt;
:See also references to Hayes in [https://www.physicalism.com/osr.pdf &#039;&#039;Everything must go&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: Limits of AI? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Video3 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Slides3 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Surveys the technical fundamentals of AI: Methods, mathematics, usage &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Natural and engineered systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The ontology of systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Complex systems &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The limits of Turing machines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Why AI cannot model complex systems adequately and synoptically, and why they therefore cannot reach a level of intelligence equal to that of human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusions: &lt;br /&gt;
:AI is a family of algorithms to automate repetitive events&lt;br /&gt;
:Deep neural networks have nothing to do with neurons&lt;br /&gt;
:AI is not artificial &#039;intelligence&#039;; it is a branch of mathematics in which the attempt is made to use the Turing machine to its limits by using gigantically large amounts of data&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/opinion/ai-gpt5-rethinking.html?unlocked_article_code=1.jE8.eAwg.I1yx07GQmDbh&amp;amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;amp;referringSource=articleShare&amp;amp;utm_source=substack&amp;amp;utm_medium=email Marcus on superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:https://www.wheresyoured.at/&lt;br /&gt;
:https://x.com/jobstlandgrebe?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
:https://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Ecological Psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jobst Landgrebe on mathematical definitions of consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Surveys the spectrum of transhumanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Debunks the feasibility of radically improving human beings via technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Explains why Sam Altman and other AI gods are so passionate about creating Artificial General Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. J. J. Gibson, direct realism, and how our behavior is tuned to affordances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-acronym-behind-our-wildest-ai-dreams-and-nightmares/ TESCREALISM]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Mind-Body Transhumanism and the Mind-Body Problem]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AI and the meaning of life:&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf There is no general AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Lugano-2025 Landgrebe on Transhumanism]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://michaelnotebook.com/xriskbrief/index.html Considering the existential risk of Artificial Superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology of the Eruv (why it would take all the fun out of real estate if everyone could live next door to John Lennon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we living in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:David Chalmers&#039; &#039;&#039;[https://www.amazon.com/Reality-Virtual-Worlds-Problems-Philosophy/dp/0393635805 Reality+]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Intelligence-Lugano-2025 Are we living in a simulation?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Living-in-a-Simulation On Chalmers on &#039;&#039;Reality&#039;&#039;+?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-in-the-Future The Future of Artificial Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine consciousness: Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are &#039;&#039;about&#039;&#039; something.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Lugano-Machine-Will Slides] / :[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Machine-Consciousness-BS-2025 Video]: Can a machine be conscious?&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt-JzB50sJE Searle&#039;s Chinese Room Argument]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs] &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918 Making AI Meaningful Again]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1258.pdf Søgaard: Do Language Models Have Semantics?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16582 Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for Classifying Objections and Constraints]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: AGI, Behavior Settings and Distributed Cognition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Niches Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Question-and-answer session with Jérémy Ravenel of [https://home.naas.ai naas.ai]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions addressed include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are you doing with BFO and LLMs? &lt;br /&gt;
:Can you rely on BFO still being operative in the proper way even after a new release of an LLM?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeremyravenel_why-is-bfo-so-powerful-bfo-basic-formal-activity-7250607560976732163-d7tZ/ Why is BFO so powerful?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-Creativity Explicit, implicit, practical, personal and tacit knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Practical-knowledge Personal knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==March 1: Submit to Dr Smith a one-paragraph description of the topic of your essay==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: Towards a theory of intelligence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/ontology-and-AI-slides-6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture6-AI-Ontology Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Definitions of intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. the ability to adapt to new situations (applies both to humans and to animals) &lt;br /&gt;
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Ryan Muldoon, &amp;quot;Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Philosophy Compass&#039;&#039; 8 (2):117-125 (2013) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team made of humans and AI systems be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See M. Stelmaszak, et al., &amp;quot;Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human-Algorithm Relations&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Journal of Management Studies&#039;&#039;, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 2. What do IQ tests measure?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-do-IQ-tests-2022 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human and animal intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyeAbcDDgg Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/file/1889978901204?v=Territoriality Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Readings:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Linda S. Gottfredson. [https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994WSJmainstream.pdf Mainstream Science on Intelligence]. In: &#039;&#039;Intelligence&#039;&#039; 24 (1997), pp. 13–23.&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The context-dependence of human intelligence, and why AGI is impossible&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 3. Affordances, tacit knowledge, cognitive niches, and the background of Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Harry Heft, &#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/shared/static/bbaq21q115pi8xpa5744ku1ftuuj6je0.pdf Ecological Psychology in Context]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/lS4-QSR1sNk?t=791 There&#039;s no &#039;I&#039; in &#039;AI&#039;], Steven Pemberton, Amsterdam, December 12, 2024 &lt;br /&gt;
::1. &#039;&#039;Ersatz&#039;&#039; definitions: using words like &#039;thinks&#039; as in &#039;the machine is thinking&#039;, but with meanings quite different from those we use when talking about human beings. As when we define &#039;flying&#039; as moving through the air, and then jumping up and down and saying &amp;quot;look, I&#039;m flying!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::2. Pareidolia: a psychological phenomenon that causes people to see patterns, objects, or meaning in ambiguous or unrelated stimuli&lt;br /&gt;
::3. If you can&#039;t spot irony, you&#039;re not intelligent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: The Free Will Problem and the Problem of the Machine Will==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computers cannot have a will, because computers &#039;&#039;don&#039;t give a damn&#039;&#039;. Therefore there can be no machine ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather&#039; says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” &#039;&#039;Fortune&#039;&#039;, June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Implications of the absence of a machine will:&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem of the singularity (when machines will take over from humans) will not arise&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality will never be realized [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Digital-Immortality-2023 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:There can be no AI ethics (only: ethics governing human beings when they use AI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the basis of ethics as applied to humans?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALFAI-2 Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;Freedom: An Impossible Reality&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Landgrebe-Ethics Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/EiBBS8ueyz4 Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Utilitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
:Value ethics&lt;br /&gt;
:Responsiblity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No responsibility without objectifying intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On what basis should we build an AI ethics? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On why AI ethics is (a) impossible, (b) unnecessary &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Readings: &lt;br /&gt;
:Moor: [https://philosophynow.org/issues/72/Four_Kinds_of_Ethical_Robots Four kinds of ethical robots]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: No AI Ethics &lt;br /&gt;
:Crane: [https://iai.tv/articles/the-ai-ethics-hoax-auid-1762?_auid=2020 The AI Ethics Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: The Ontology of Consciousness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:John Searle&lt;br /&gt;
::On consciousness: the Chinese Room Argument&lt;br /&gt;
::Searle and Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Neuroscience and consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_being_you_a_new_science_of_consciousness Anil Seth, &#039;&#039;Being You: A New Science of Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02192-y Making AI meaningful again]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALWTM Raymond Tallis, &#039;&#039;Why the Mind is not a Computer&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALTEA Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;The Explicit Animal: A Defence of Human Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Featuring [https://johnbeverley.com/ John Beverley]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transcription-Debate-1 Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debating the following motions: &lt;br /&gt;
:Philosophy is irrelevant to ontology engineering &lt;br /&gt;
::[https://buffalo.box.com/v/use-mention-confusion The use-mention confusion]&lt;br /&gt;
:Mappings merely give extra life to bad ontologies &lt;br /&gt;
:AI fear is justified&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO is too slow to react&lt;br /&gt;
:Knowledge graphs cannot prevent hallucinations&lt;br /&gt;
:There can never be AGI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Strategies for leveraging ontologies and knowledge graphs to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models and address their limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI] with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An introduction to the statistical foundations of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-the-Future Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Statistical-Foundations-of-AI Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The types of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Deterministic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Good old fashioned AI (GOFAI)&lt;br /&gt;
:Basic stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::How regression works&lt;br /&gt;
:Advanced stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Neural networks and deep learning&lt;br /&gt;
:Hybrid&lt;br /&gt;
::Neurosymbolic AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Background reading: &#039;&#039;Why machines will never rule the world&#039;&#039;, 1e chapter 8, 2e chapter 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/UzHTEMxgKEc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture10Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Debate2-Transcription Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will combining the semantically rich architectures provided by ontologies and knowledge graphs with the generative strengths of LLMs provide a path towards more explainable artificial intelligence systems, more trustworthy output, and a deeper understanding of vulnerabilities arising from integrated architectures?&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality is idiotic&lt;br /&gt;
:We should allow AI research to proceed unregulated&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if you think AGI is impossible, you should treat robots at certain levels of sophistication as moral agents&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;OWL semantics&#039; have nothing to do with the semantics of ordinary language&lt;br /&gt;
:AI will take away our jobs&lt;br /&gt;
:There will never be driverless cars&lt;br /&gt;
:Science is not ready for software, let alone AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outlines the current landscape of ontology-based AI enhancement strategies, highlighting what goes well and what goes poorly, and why ontology engineering is necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://quantumzeitgeist.com/haghighi-stanford-demonstrates-ontological-bias-in-chatgpt-image-generation-via-root-depiction/ Ontological Assumptions in AI Outputs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==April 1: Deadline for submission to BS of starting drafts for your essays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 2000 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 2000 + 3000 words / 1000 + 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: On Hallucinations and Political Correctness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lecture by [https://x.com/JobstLandgrebe?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Jobst Landgrebe] on Why machines will never stop hallucinating:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Slides-Hallucinating Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In current-day culture, concerns are raised when LLMs responds with symbol or pixel sequences which are seen as deviating from social norms of political correctness or wokeness -- or in other words, when they say the unsayable. Further problems are riased for LLM technology by the inconvenient fact of hallucinations, since this prevents their usage for task automation. LLM architects and engineers try to prevent both types of events. This talk shows why it is impossible to ensure that LLMs do not hallucinate or speak the unspeakable, drawing on arguments from the theory of computation (Turing decision/Rice theorem, Gödel&#039;s First Incompleteness Theorem).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Literature: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10719 Glukhov et. al 2023], LLM Censorship: A Machine Learning Challenge or a Computer Security Problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05746 Banerjee et al. 2024], LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf Apple, The Illusion of Thinking]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: Landgrebe on the Replication Crisis. Jacko on the Ontological Foundations of Proxemics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: &#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Ontological Foundations of Proxemics&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lectuer12-Jacko-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Jacko-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proxemics is the study of spatial behaviour in interpersonal communication. It rests on a set of implicit and explicit assumptions about the nature of space, embodiment, intentionality, and meaning. This presentation aims to articulate these assumptions and outline a conceptual framework for understanding proxemics as an ontologically grounded discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background on the replication crisis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 The replication problems which arise when AI applied in scientific research]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Is Psychology Finished?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1983994242272993592 Bayer tested some findings and only achieved a 21% replication rate for biomedical studies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI]&#039;&#039;, October 2024, with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: Landgrebe on machine intelligence. Jacko on psychopathic AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Why we cannot create intelligence inside a machine&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jobst-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Landgrebe-Limits Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Timothy W. Coleman: Beyond the Limits of AI: Ontology as a Framework for Good System Design (Student presentation)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael Behun III: The Paradox within Artificial Intelligence Development&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Are intelligent machines psychopathic by design?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jacko-Pathology Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two major paradigms in clinical psychology. The first treats mental and personality disorders as disturbances of an inner life: of subjective experience, affect, and self-awareness. This view cannot be meaningfully applied to artificial systems, for which no such subjectivity is given. The second paradigm is behavioural and functional. Here disorders, especially personality disorders, are defined as stable, recurrent patterns of behaviour, cognition, and interpersonal functioning that deviate from expected norms and impair adaptation. Psychopathy in this framework is a cluster of observable traits: persistent violation of social rules, instrumental treatment of others, chronically shallow or incongruent emotional expression, irresponsibility, and a striking absence of anxiety or inhibition in situations that normally elicit it. In this talk I adopt the second, behavioural paradigm and extend it to artificial systems, introducingthe notion of &#039;&#039;&#039;AI quasi-personality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14: Oral presentations (Compulsory for all students)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this class is &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background Material on AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to AI for Philosophers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmiY8_XVvzs Why not robot cops? Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-not-robot-cops Why not robot cops? Slides] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to Philosophy for Computer Scientists&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-is-philosophy Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Crash-Course-Introduction Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.cp.eng.chula.ac.th/~prabhas/teaching/cbs-it-seminar/2012/aiphil-mccarthy.pdf John McCarthy, &amp;quot;What has AI in common with philosophy?&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cosmosandtaxis.org/ct-1256/ Companion volume to &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Interviews_and_podcasts_on_%27%27Why_Machines_Will_Never_Rule_the_World%27%27 Podcasts and interviews on &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Learning Outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Comprehend the Architecture and Operation of Large Language Models: Explain the basic design and functioning of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Define and use correctly key terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Evaluate the Theoretical and Practical Limits of AI: Explain the limitations of AI systems as applications of Turing-computable mathematics. Critically assess claims about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the “singularity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Examine Theories of Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Simulation: Explain why machines lack intentionality and subjective experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Understand Ethical and Normative Dimensions of AI: Explain why AI systems cannot possess will, intention, or moral responsibility, and differentiate between AI ethics and ethics of AI use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Apply Ontology-Based Strategies for AI Enhancement: Explain how ontologies and knowledge graphs can improve the explainability, consistency, and interoperability of AI systems. Identify strengths and weaknesses of ontology-based and neurosymbolic AI approaches.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=178</id>
		<title>Ontology and AI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=178"/>
		<updated>2026-03-13T15:40:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;PHI 637 Ontology and AI Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spring 2026 - PHI637SEM-SMI2 - Special Topics: Ontology and Artificial Intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks 1-13 Asynchronous &lt;br /&gt;
Week 14 Synchronous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: [https://ontology.buffalo.edu/Smith Barry Smith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The course program below is divided into numbered weeks. The information for each week begins with links to that week&#039;s main video together with the underlying slides. (Transcriptions of the video will be added in the course of the semester). There is also additional background material which is provided as a starting point for further explorations on the part of each student. You should feel free to ignore those items in this background material which you do not find of interest.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a remote asynchronous course. Student presentations will be scheduled in a synchronous session towards the end of April. Additional, informal synchronous sessions may be organized during the course of the semester. One-on-one sessions with Dr Smith can be organised on request to phismith@buffalo.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get a grade for this class you need to submit to Dr Smith an essay on a topic of your choice relating to the interactions between ontology and AI, with one or other topics documented below as your starting point. On or before March 1 you should send an email to Dr Smith with a one-paragraph outline of your topic. Feel free to contact Dr Smith if you are unsure of what your topic should be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All enrolled students must email to BS a Starting Draft version of their essay by April 1 at the latest. Further drafts may be needed in response to Dr Smith&#039;s editorial comments. Students must submit a final, full version of their essay and of the associated powerpoint deck by May 1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Essay word length requirements are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 2500 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 2500 + 3500 words / starting draft: 1000 + 1000 words &lt;br /&gt;
:Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / starting draft: 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3-credit-hour students may submit one single essay with the corresponding combined word count.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grading will be assigned according to the following division:&lt;br /&gt;
:Essay(s): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Presentation (and accompanying powerpoint deck): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Class Participation (responses to presentations): 20%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;AI Policy&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The starting draft of your essay, to be submitted to BS on or before April 1, should be your own work. This means no use of LLMs. All students are, however, welcome thereafter to use LLMs on polishing their starting drafts, providing that they follow these rules: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 1: Include a declaration on p. 1 to the effect that the essay was written entirely without any sort of AI assistance. I reserve the right to use software tools, but also my own judgment, to ensure this draft was written by you. Grades under option 1. will be determined by the quality of your essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 2 is in multiple steps:&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 1. Create a draft in your own words of an essay that is about half as long as your target length length. This should be a substantive draft, but it can contain for example rough notes pointing to further lines of development. Not only this initial draft, but also all further steps in the list below, should rely on study by you of the relevant literature. Both your draft and your final essay should accordingly contain lists of references.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 2. Submit this draft to me at phismith@buffalo.edu by the middle of the semester.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 3. You create a new prompt using your draft as an attachment with an instruction such as: &#039;&#039;show me how I can improve the attached&#039;&#039;. This will start a potentially long process of improvements in your essay incorporating further contributions from you together with assistance from the LLM. You should attempt to use prompts to manipulate the style of the LLM output in a direction of a style appropriate to serious academic research, with references, quotations, definitions, as needed. Most importantly: you should be aware that LLMs often make errors (called &#039;hallucinations&#039;), for example inventing references in the literature which do not in fact exist.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 4. the LLM has been keeping track of everything you tell it to do since you started the newchat. When you think you might be ready to submit, use the LLM save function to generate a URI linking to all the interactions thus far – effectively a log of your process. This log, together with your initial and final essay will form part of what will be evaluated for your grade.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 5. When you truly are ready to submit, press save for one last time and take a note of the link; send me this link, together with your completed essay, and with any notes on features of the log you which to point out -- for example requests that I ignore specific chains of prompts because they proved to be dead ends.&lt;br /&gt;
Grades under Option 2 will be determined on the basis of (a) originality of the initial draft, (b) creativity of your prompts, (c) quality of final essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at the synchronous session featuring student presentations around May 1 is compulsory for all students&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology (also called &#039;metaphysics&#039;) is a subfield of philosophy which aims to establich the kinds of entities in the world -- including both the material and the mental world -- and the relations between them. Applied ontology applies philosophical ideas and methods to support those who are collecting, using, comparing, refining, evaluating or (today above all) generating data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as &#039;intelligent&#039;. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create what is called &#039;&#039;General Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039; (AGI), by which is meant an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being. ChatGT and other large language models (LLMs) attempt to generate data from other data, where the latter are obtained for example by crawling the internet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Required reading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-machines-1e Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]&#039;&#039; (Routledge 2022; revised and enlarged second edition, published in 2025), [https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9939883749704803&amp;amp;context=L&amp;amp;vid=01SUNY_BUF:everything&amp;amp;lang=en&amp;amp;search_scope=UBSUNY&amp;amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;amp;tab=EverythingUBSUNY&amp;amp;query=any,contains,jobst%20landgrebe available online from UB Library] . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also offer [https://www.routledge.com/Why-Machines-Will-Never-Rule-the-World-Artificial-Intelligence-without-Fear/Landgrebe-Smith/p/book/9781032941400?srsltid=AfmBOoor0YJakTv88G0LUq0tWvBh3YS604AK0Gfr8Bd0YYgsgq1U6J7y here] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: The Glory and the Misery of Large Language Models==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: A brief introduction to Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. Focusing on booth positive and negative aspects of how they work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMD_1yA3TXk Video1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Glory-and-Misery Slides1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/s/ufnf1gwozzzd3hpmcmmbz2j7l0dzht56 Transcript]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2: GPT-5 and the French and Indian War: Teach yourself history with ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm4mCgAsI6I Video2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/French-and-Indian-War Slides2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions to ponder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What does &#039;stochastic&#039; mean in &#039;stochastic AI&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is &#039;scaling&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are hallucinations?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Good Old Fashioned (Logical, Symbolic) AI to ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/B4L27eavNT4 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Slides-Lecture-2 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its inception in the last century, AI has enjoyed repeated cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment (AI summers and winters). Recent successes of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened a new era of popularization of AI. For the first time, AI tools have been created that are immediately available to the wider population, who for the first time can have real hands-on experience of what AI can do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this first lecture we will address the origins of AI in Stanford University in the 1970s and &#039;80s, and specifically in the work on common-sense ontology of Patrick Hayes and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics to be dealt with include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is ontology?&lt;br /&gt;
:From Aristotle to 20th century philosophical ontology&lt;br /&gt;
:Patrick Hayes, Naive Physics and ontology-based robotics&lt;br /&gt;
:Doug Lennat and the CYC (for &#039;enCYClopedia&#039; project)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why CYC failed&lt;br /&gt;
:Why ontology is still important to AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/History-of-AI History of AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://utt.hal.science/hal-02954862v1/document Where do ontologies come from?]&lt;br /&gt;
:See also references to Hayes in [https://www.physicalism.com/osr.pdf &#039;&#039;Everything must go&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: Limits of AI? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Video3 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Slides3 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Surveys the technical fundamentals of AI: Methods, mathematics, usage &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Natural and engineered systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The ontology of systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Complex systems &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The limits of Turing machines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Why AI cannot model complex systems adequately and synoptically, and why they therefore cannot reach a level of intelligence equal to that of human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusions: &lt;br /&gt;
:AI is a family of algorithms to automate repetitive events&lt;br /&gt;
:Deep neural networks have nothing to do with neurons&lt;br /&gt;
:AI is not artificial &#039;intelligence&#039;; it is a branch of mathematics in which the attempt is made to use the Turing machine to its limits by using gigantically large amounts of data&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/opinion/ai-gpt5-rethinking.html?unlocked_article_code=1.jE8.eAwg.I1yx07GQmDbh&amp;amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;amp;referringSource=articleShare&amp;amp;utm_source=substack&amp;amp;utm_medium=email Marcus on superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:https://www.wheresyoured.at/&lt;br /&gt;
:https://x.com/jobstlandgrebe?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
:https://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Ecological Psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jobst Landgrebe on mathematical definitions of consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Surveys the spectrum of transhumanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Debunks the feasibility of radically improving human beings via technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Explains why Sam Altman and other AI gods are so passionate about creating Artificial General Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. J. J. Gibson, direct realism, and how our behavior is tuned to affordances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-acronym-behind-our-wildest-ai-dreams-and-nightmares/ TESCREALISM]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Mind-Body Transhumanism and the Mind-Body Problem]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AI and the meaning of life:&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf There is no general AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Lugano-2025 Landgrebe on Transhumanism]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://michaelnotebook.com/xriskbrief/index.html Considering the existential risk of Artificial Superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology of the Eruv (why it would take all the fun out of real estate if everyone could live next door to John Lennon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we living in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:David Chalmers&#039; &#039;&#039;[https://www.amazon.com/Reality-Virtual-Worlds-Problems-Philosophy/dp/0393635805 Reality+]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Intelligence-Lugano-2025 Are we living in a simulation?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Living-in-a-Simulation On Chalmers on &#039;&#039;Reality&#039;&#039;+?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-in-the-Future The Future of Artificial Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine consciousness: Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are &#039;&#039;about&#039;&#039; something.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Lugano-Machine-Will Slides] / :[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Machine-Consciousness-BS-2025 Video]: Can a machine be conscious?&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt-JzB50sJE Searle&#039;s Chinese Room Argument]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs] &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918 Making AI Meaningful Again]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1258.pdf Søgaard: Do Language Models Have Semantics?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16582 Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for Classifying Objections and Constraints]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: AGI, Behavior Settings and Distributed Cognition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Niches Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Question-and-answer session with Jérémy Ravenel of [https://home.naas.ai naas.ai]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions addressed include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are you doing with BFO and LLMs? &lt;br /&gt;
:Can you rely on BFO still being operative in the proper way even after a new release of an LLM?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeremyravenel_why-is-bfo-so-powerful-bfo-basic-formal-activity-7250607560976732163-d7tZ/ Why is BFO so powerful?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-Creativity Explicit, implicit, practical, personal and tacit knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Practical-knowledge Personal knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==March 1: Submit to Dr Smith a one-paragraph description of the topic of your essay==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: Towards a theory of intelligence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/ontology-and-AI-slides-6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture6-AI-Ontology Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Definitions of intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. the ability to adapt to new situations (applies both to humans and to animals) &lt;br /&gt;
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Ryan Muldoon, &amp;quot;Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Philosophy Compass&#039;&#039; 8 (2):117-125 (2013) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team made of humans and AI systems be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See M. Stelmaszak, et al., &amp;quot;Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human-Algorithm Relations&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Journal of Management Studies&#039;&#039;, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 2. What do IQ tests measure?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-do-IQ-tests-2022 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human and animal intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyeAbcDDgg Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/file/1889978901204?v=Territoriality Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Readings:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Linda S. Gottfredson. [https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994WSJmainstream.pdf Mainstream Science on Intelligence]. In: &#039;&#039;Intelligence&#039;&#039; 24 (1997), pp. 13–23.&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The context-dependence of human intelligence, and why AGI is impossible&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 3. Affordances, tacit knowledge, cognitive niches, and the background of Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Harry Heft, &#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/shared/static/bbaq21q115pi8xpa5744ku1ftuuj6je0.pdf Ecological Psychology in Context]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/lS4-QSR1sNk?t=791 There&#039;s no &#039;I&#039; in &#039;AI&#039;], Steven Pemberton, Amsterdam, December 12, 2024 &lt;br /&gt;
::1. &#039;&#039;Ersatz&#039;&#039; definitions: using words like &#039;thinks&#039; as in &#039;the machine is thinking&#039;, but with meanings quite different from those we use when talking about human beings. As when we define &#039;flying&#039; as moving through the air, and then jumping up and down and saying &amp;quot;look, I&#039;m flying!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::2. Pareidolia: a psychological phenomenon that causes people to see patterns, objects, or meaning in ambiguous or unrelated stimuli&lt;br /&gt;
::3. If you can&#039;t spot irony, you&#039;re not intelligent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: The Free Will Problem and the Problem of the Machine Will==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computers cannot have a will, because computers &#039;&#039;don&#039;t give a damn&#039;&#039;. Therefore there can be no machine ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather&#039; says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” &#039;&#039;Fortune&#039;&#039;, June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Implications of the absence of a machine will:&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem of the singularity (when machines will take over from humans) will not arise&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality will never be realized [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Digital-Immortality-2023 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:There can be no AI ethics (only: ethics governing human beings when they use AI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the basis of ethics as applied to humans?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALFAI-2 Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;Freedom: An Impossible Reality&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Landgrebe-Ethics Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/EiBBS8ueyz4 Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Utilitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
:Value ethics&lt;br /&gt;
:Responsiblity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No responsibility without objectifying intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On what basis should we build an AI ethics? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On why AI ethics is (a) impossible, (b) unnecessary &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Readings: &lt;br /&gt;
:Moor: [https://philosophynow.org/issues/72/Four_Kinds_of_Ethical_Robots Four kinds of ethical robots]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: No AI Ethics &lt;br /&gt;
:Crane: [https://iai.tv/articles/the-ai-ethics-hoax-auid-1762?_auid=2020 The AI Ethics Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: The Ontology of Consciousness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:John Searle&lt;br /&gt;
::On consciousness: the Chinese Room Argument&lt;br /&gt;
::Searle and Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Neuroscience and consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_being_you_a_new_science_of_consciousness Anil Seth, &#039;&#039;Being You: A New Science of Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02192-y Making AI meaningful again]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALWTM Raymond Tallis, &#039;&#039;Why the Mind is not a Computer&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALTEA Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;The Explicit Animal: A Defence of Human Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Featuring [https://johnbeverley.com/ John Beverley]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transcription-Debate-1 Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debating the following motions: &lt;br /&gt;
:Philosophy is irrelevant to ontology engineering &lt;br /&gt;
::[https://buffalo.box.com/v/use-mention-confusion The use-mention confusion]&lt;br /&gt;
:Mappings merely give extra life to bad ontologies &lt;br /&gt;
:AI fear is justified&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO is too slow to react&lt;br /&gt;
:Knowledge graphs cannot prevent hallucinations&lt;br /&gt;
:There can never be AGI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Strategies for leveraging ontologies and knowledge graphs to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models and address their limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI] with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An introduction to the statistical foundations of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-the-Future Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Statistical-Foundations-of-AI Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The types of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Deterministic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Good old fashioned AI (GOFAI)&lt;br /&gt;
:Basic stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::How regression works&lt;br /&gt;
:Advanced stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Neural networks and deep learning&lt;br /&gt;
:Hybrid&lt;br /&gt;
::Neurosymbolic AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Background reading: &#039;&#039;Why machines will never rule the world&#039;&#039;, 1e chapter 8, 2e chapter 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/UzHTEMxgKEc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture10Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Debate2-Transcription Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will combining the semantically rich architectures provided by ontologies and knowledge graphs with the generative strengths of LLMs provide a path towards more explainable artificial intelligence systems, more trustworthy output, and a deeper understanding of vulnerabilities arising from integrated architectures?&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality is idiotic&lt;br /&gt;
:We should allow AI research to proceed unregulated&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if you think AGI is impossible, you should treat robots at certain levels of sophistication as moral agents&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;OWL semantics&#039; have nothing to do with the semantics of ordinary language&lt;br /&gt;
:AI will take away our jobs&lt;br /&gt;
:There will never be driverless cars&lt;br /&gt;
:Science is not ready for software, let alone AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outlines the current landscape of ontology-based AI enhancement strategies, highlighting what goes well and what goes poorly, and why ontology engineering is necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://quantumzeitgeist.com/haghighi-stanford-demonstrates-ontological-bias-in-chatgpt-image-generation-via-root-depiction/ Ontological Assumptions in AI Outputs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==April 1: Deadline for submission to BS of starting drafts for your essays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 2000 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 2000 + 3000 words / 1000 + 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: On Hallucinations and Political Correctness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lecture by [https://x.com/JobstLandgrebe?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Jobst Landgrebe] on Why machines will never stop hallucinating:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Slides-Hallucinating Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In current-day culture, concerns are raised when LLMs responds with symbol or pixel sequences which are seen as deviating from social norms of political correctness or wokeness -- or in other words, when they say the unsayable. Further problems are riased for LLM technology by the inconvenient fact of hallucinations, since this prevents their usage for task automation. LLM architects and engineers try to prevent both types of events. This talk shows why it is impossible to ensure that LLMs do not hallucinate or speak the unspeakable, drawing on arguments from the theory of computation (Turing decision/Rice theorem, Gödel&#039;s First Incompleteness Theorem).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Literature: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10719 Glukhov et. al 2023], LLM Censorship: A Machine Learning Challenge or a Computer Security Problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05746 Banerjee et al. 2024], LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf Apple, The Illusion of Thinking]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: Landgrebe on the Replication Crisis. Jacko on the Ontological Foundations of Proxemics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: &#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Ontological Foundations of Proxemics&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lectuer12-Jacko-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Jacko-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proxemics is the study of spatial behaviour in interpersonal communication. It rests on a set of implicit and explicit assumptions about the nature of space, embodiment, intentionality, and meaning. This presentation aims to articulate these assumptions and outline a conceptual framework for understanding proxemics as an ontologically grounded discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background on the replication crisis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 The replication problems which arise when AI applied in scientific research]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Is Psychology Finished?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1983994242272993592 Bayer tested some findings and only achieved a 21% replication rate for biomedical studies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI]&#039;&#039;, October 2024, with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: Landgrebe on machine intelligence. Jacko on psychopathic AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Why we cannot create intelligence inside a machine&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jobst-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Landgrebe-Limits Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Timothy W. Coleman: Beyond the Limits of AI: Ontology as a Framework for Good System Design (Student presentation)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael Behun III: The Paradox within Artificial Intelligence Development&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Are intelligent machines psychopathic by design?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jacko-Pathology Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two major paradigms in clinical psychology. The first treats mental and personality disorders as disturbances of an inner life: of subjective experience, affect, and self-awareness. This view cannot be meaningfully applied to artificial systems, for which no such subjectivity is given. The second paradigm is behavioural and functional. Here disorders, especially personality disorders, are defined as stable, recurrent patterns of behaviour, cognition, and interpersonal functioning that deviate from expected norms and impair adaptation. Psychopathy in this framework is a cluster of observable traits: persistent violation of social rules, instrumental treatment of others, chronically shallow or incongruent emotional expression, irresponsibility, and a striking absence of anxiety or inhibition in situations that normally elicit it. In this talk I adopt the second, behavioural paradigm and extend it to artificial systems, introducingthe notion of &#039;&#039;&#039;AI quasi-personality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14: Oral presentations (Compulsory for all students)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this class is &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background Material on AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to AI for Philosophers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmiY8_XVvzs Why not robot cops? Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-not-robot-cops Why not robot cops? Slides] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to Philosophy for Computer Scientists&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-is-philosophy Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Crash-Course-Introduction Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.cp.eng.chula.ac.th/~prabhas/teaching/cbs-it-seminar/2012/aiphil-mccarthy.pdf John McCarthy, &amp;quot;What has AI in common with philosophy?&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cosmosandtaxis.org/ct-1256/ Companion volume to &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Interviews_and_podcasts_on_%27%27Why_Machines_Will_Never_Rule_the_World%27%27 Podcasts and interviews on &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Learning Outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Comprehend the Architecture and Operation of Large Language Models: Explain the basic design and functioning of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Define and use correctly key terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Evaluate the Theoretical and Practical Limits of AI: Explain the limitations of AI systems as applications of Turing-computable mathematics. Critically assess claims about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the “singularity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Examine Theories of Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Simulation: Explain why machines lack intentionality and subjective experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Understand Ethical and Normative Dimensions of AI: Explain why AI systems cannot possess will, intention, or moral responsibility, and differentiate between AI ethics and ethics of AI use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Apply Ontology-Based Strategies for AI Enhancement: Explain how ontologies and knowledge graphs can improve the explainability, consistency, and interoperability of AI systems. Identify strengths and weaknesses of ontology-based and neurosymbolic AI approaches.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Special_Topics_PHI_579:_The_World%27s_Ontology_Ecosystem&amp;diff=177</id>
		<title>Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Special_Topics_PHI_579:_The_World%27s_Ontology_Ecosystem&amp;diff=177"/>
		<updated>2026-03-09T18:23:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: Created page with &amp;quot;This is an introductory survey of ontology initiatives from Aristotle to Linnaeus and from DOLCE to Palantir.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is an introductory survey of ontology initiatives from Aristotle to Linnaeus and from DOLCE to Palantir.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=176</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=176"/>
		<updated>2026-03-09T18:22:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Main_Page Course details]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;UB Applied Ontology Master of Science Program: Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four courses are available for Spring 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO-Intro Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Introduction_to_Philosophy_from_an_Ontological_Perspective Introduction to Philosophy from an Ontological Perspective], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_and_AI Ontology and AI], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php/Ontology_of_Economics Ontology of Economics], University at Buffalo, Spring 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following course is tentatively planned for Summer 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special Topics PHI 579: The World&#039;s Ontology Ecosystem]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=175</id>
		<title>Ontology and AI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=175"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T22:02:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;PHI 637 Ontology and AI Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spring 2026 - PHI637SEM-SMI2 - Special Topics: Ontology and Artificial Intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks 1-13 Asynchronous &lt;br /&gt;
Week 14 Synchronous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: [https://ontology.buffalo.edu/Smith Barry Smith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The course program below is divided into numbered weeks. The information for each week begins with links to that week&#039;s main video together with the underlying slides. (Transcriptions of the video will be added in the course of the semester). There is also additional background material which is provided as a starting point for further explorations on the part of each student. You should feel free to ignore those items in this background material which you do not find of interest.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a remote asynchronous course. Student presentations will be scheduled in a synchronous session towards the end of April. Additional, informal synchronous sessions may be organized during the course of the semester. One-on-one sessions with Dr Smith can be organised on request to phismith@buffalo.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get a grade for this class you need to submit to Dr Smith an essay on a topic of your choice relating to the interactions between ontology and AI, with one or other topics documented below as your starting point. On or before March 1 you should send an email to Dr Smith with a one-paragraph outline of your topic. Feel free to contact Dr Smith if you are unsure of what your topic should be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All enrolled students must email to BS a Starting Draft version of their essay by April 1 at the latest. Further drafts may be needed in response to Dr Smith&#039;s editorial comments. Students must submit a final, full version of their essay and of the associated powerpoint deck by May 1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Essay word length requirements are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 2500 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 2500 + 3500 words / starting draft: 1000 + 1000 words &lt;br /&gt;
:Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / starting draft: 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3-credit-hour students may submit one single essay with the corresponding combined word count.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grading will be assigned according to the following division:&lt;br /&gt;
:Essay(s): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Presentation (and accompanying powerpoint deck): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Class Participation (responses to presentations): 20%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;AI Policy&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The starting draft of your essay, to be submitted to BS on or before April 1, should be your own work. This means no use of LLMs. All students are, however, welcome thereafter to use LLMs on polishing their starting drafts, providing that they follow these rules: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 1: Include a declaration on p. 1 to the effect that the essay was written entirely without any sort of AI assistance. I reserve the right to use software tools, but also my own judgment, to ensure this draft was written by you. Grades under option 1. will be determined by the quality of your essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 2 is in multiple steps:&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 1. Create a draft in your own words of an essay that is about half as long as your target length length. This should be a substantive draft, but it can contain for example rough notes pointing to further lines of development. Not only this initial draft, but also all further steps in the list below, should rely on study by you of the relevant literature. Both your draft and your final essay should accordingly contain lists of references.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 2. Submit this draft to me at phismith@buffalo.edu by the middle of the semester.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 3. You create a new prompt using your draft as an attachment with an instruction such as: &#039;&#039;show me how I can improve the attached&#039;&#039;. This will start a potentially long process of improvements in your essay incorporating further contributions from you together with assistance from the LLM. You should attempt to use prompts to manipulate the style of the LLM output in a direction of a style appropriate to serious academic research, with references, quotations, definitions, as needed. Most importantly: you should be aware that LLMs often make errors (called &#039;hallucinations&#039;), for example inventing references in the literature which do not in fact exist.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 4. the LLM has been keeping track of everything you tell it to do since you started the newchat. When you think you might be ready to submit, use the LLM save function to generate a URI linking to all the interactions thus far – effectively a log of your process. This log, together with your initial and final essay will for part of what will be evaluated for your grade.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 5. When you truly are ready to submit, press save for one last time and take a note of the link; send me this link, together with your completed essay, and with any notes on features of the log you which to point out -- for example requests that I ignore specific chains of prompts because they proved to be dead ends.&lt;br /&gt;
Grades under Option 2 will be determined on the basis of (a) originality of the initial draft, (b) creativity of your prompts, (c) quality of final essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at the synchronous session featuring student presentations around May 1 is compulsory for all students&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology (also called &#039;metaphysics&#039;) is a subfield of philosophy which aims to establich the kinds of entities in the world -- including both the material and the mental world -- and the relations between them. Applied ontology applies philosophical ideas and methods to support those who are collecting, using, comparing, refining, evaluating or (today above all) generating data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as &#039;intelligent&#039;. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create what is called &#039;&#039;General Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039; (AGI), by which is meant an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being. ChatGT and other large language models (LLMs) attempt to generate data from other data, where the latter are obtained for example by crawling the internet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Required reading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-machines-1e Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]&#039;&#039; (Routledge 2022; revised and enlarged second edition, published in 2025), [https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9939883749704803&amp;amp;context=L&amp;amp;vid=01SUNY_BUF:everything&amp;amp;lang=en&amp;amp;search_scope=UBSUNY&amp;amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;amp;tab=EverythingUBSUNY&amp;amp;query=any,contains,jobst%20landgrebe available online from UB Library] . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also offer [https://www.routledge.com/Why-Machines-Will-Never-Rule-the-World-Artificial-Intelligence-without-Fear/Landgrebe-Smith/p/book/9781032941400?srsltid=AfmBOoor0YJakTv88G0LUq0tWvBh3YS604AK0Gfr8Bd0YYgsgq1U6J7y here] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: The Glory and the Misery of Large Language Models==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: A brief introduction to Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. Focusing on booth positive and negative aspects of how they work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMD_1yA3TXk Video1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Glory-and-Misery Slides1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/s/ufnf1gwozzzd3hpmcmmbz2j7l0dzht56 Transcript]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2: GPT-5 and the French and Indian War: Teach yourself history with ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm4mCgAsI6I Video2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/French-and-Indian-War Slides2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions to ponder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What does &#039;stochastic&#039; mean in &#039;stochastic AI&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is &#039;scaling&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are hallucinations?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Good Old Fashioned (Logical, Symbolic) AI to ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/B4L27eavNT4 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Slides-Lecture-2 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its inception in the last century, AI has enjoyed repeated cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment (AI summers and winters). Recent successes of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened a new era of popularization of AI. For the first time, AI tools have been created that are immediately available to the wider population, who for the first time can have real hands-on experience of what AI can do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this first lecture we will address the origins of AI in Stanford University in the 1970s and &#039;80s, and specifically in the work on common-sense ontology of Patrick Hayes and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics to be dealt with include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is ontology?&lt;br /&gt;
:From Aristotle to 20th century philosophical ontology&lt;br /&gt;
:Patrick Hayes, Naive Physics and ontology-based robotics&lt;br /&gt;
:Doug Lennat and the CYC (for &#039;enCYClopedia&#039; project)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why CYC failed&lt;br /&gt;
:Why ontology is still important to AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/History-of-AI History of AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://utt.hal.science/hal-02954862v1/document Where do ontologies come from?]&lt;br /&gt;
:See also references to Hayes in [https://www.physicalism.com/osr.pdf &#039;&#039;Everything must go&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: Limits of AI? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Video3 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Slides3 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Surveys the technical fundamentals of AI: Methods, mathematics, usage &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Natural and engineered systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The ontology of systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Complex systems &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The limits of Turing machines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Why AI cannot model complex systems adequately and synoptically, and why they therefore cannot reach a level of intelligence equal to that of human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusions: &lt;br /&gt;
:AI is a family of algorithms to automate repetitive events&lt;br /&gt;
:Deep neural networks have nothing to do with neurons&lt;br /&gt;
:AI is not artificial &#039;intelligence&#039;; it is a branch of mathematics in which the attempt is made to use the Turing machine to its limits by using gigantically large amounts of data&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/opinion/ai-gpt5-rethinking.html?unlocked_article_code=1.jE8.eAwg.I1yx07GQmDbh&amp;amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;amp;referringSource=articleShare&amp;amp;utm_source=substack&amp;amp;utm_medium=email Marcus on superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:https://www.wheresyoured.at/&lt;br /&gt;
:https://x.com/jobstlandgrebe?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
:https://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Ecological Psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jobst Landgrebe on mathematical definitions of consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Surveys the spectrum of transhumanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Debunks the feasibility of radically improving human beings via technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Explains why Sam Altman and other AI gods are so passionate about creating Artificial General Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. J. J. Gibson, direct realism, and how our behavior is tuned to affordances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-acronym-behind-our-wildest-ai-dreams-and-nightmares/ TESCREALISM]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Mind-Body Transhumanism and the Mind-Body Problem]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AI and the meaning of life:&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf There is no general AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Lugano-2025 Landgrebe on Transhumanism]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://michaelnotebook.com/xriskbrief/index.html Considering the existential risk of Artificial Superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology of the Eruv (why it would take all the fun out of real estate if everyone could live next door to John Lennon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we living in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:David Chalmers&#039; &#039;&#039;[https://www.amazon.com/Reality-Virtual-Worlds-Problems-Philosophy/dp/0393635805 Reality+]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Intelligence-Lugano-2025 Are we living in a simulation?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Living-in-a-Simulation On Chalmers on &#039;&#039;Reality&#039;&#039;+?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-in-the-Future The Future of Artificial Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine consciousness: Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are &#039;&#039;about&#039;&#039; something.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Lugano-Machine-Will Slides] / :[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Machine-Consciousness-BS-2025 Video]: Can a machine be conscious?&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt-JzB50sJE Searle&#039;s Chinese Room Argument]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs] &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918 Making AI Meaningful Again]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1258.pdf Søgaard: Do Language Models Have Semantics?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16582 Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for Classifying Objections and Constraints]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: AGI, Behavior Settings and Distributed Cognition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Niches Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Question-and-answer session with Jérémy Ravenel of [https://home.naas.ai naas.ai]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions addressed include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are you doing with BFO and LLMs? &lt;br /&gt;
:Can you rely on BFO still being operative in the proper way even after a new release of an LLM?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeremyravenel_why-is-bfo-so-powerful-bfo-basic-formal-activity-7250607560976732163-d7tZ/ Why is BFO so powerful?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-Creativity Explicit, implicit, practical, personal and tacit knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Practical-knowledge Personal knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==March 1: Submit to Dr Smith a one-paragraph description of the topic of your essay==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: Towards a theory of intelligence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/ontology-and-AI-slides-6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture6-AI-Ontology Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Definitions of intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. the ability to adapt to new situations (applies both to humans and to animals) &lt;br /&gt;
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Ryan Muldoon, &amp;quot;Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Philosophy Compass&#039;&#039; 8 (2):117-125 (2013) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team made of humans and AI systems be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See M. Stelmaszak, et al., &amp;quot;Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human-Algorithm Relations&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Journal of Management Studies&#039;&#039;, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 2. What do IQ tests measure?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-do-IQ-tests-2022 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human and animal intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyeAbcDDgg Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/file/1889978901204?v=Territoriality Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Readings:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Linda S. Gottfredson. [https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994WSJmainstream.pdf Mainstream Science on Intelligence]. In: &#039;&#039;Intelligence&#039;&#039; 24 (1997), pp. 13–23.&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The context-dependence of human intelligence, and why AGI is impossible&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 3. Affordances, tacit knowledge, cognitive niches, and the background of Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Harry Heft, &#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/shared/static/bbaq21q115pi8xpa5744ku1ftuuj6je0.pdf Ecological Psychology in Context]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/lS4-QSR1sNk?t=791 There&#039;s no &#039;I&#039; in &#039;AI&#039;], Steven Pemberton, Amsterdam, December 12, 2024 &lt;br /&gt;
::1. &#039;&#039;Ersatz&#039;&#039; definitions: using words like &#039;thinks&#039; as in &#039;the machine is thinking&#039;, but with meanings quite different from those we use when talking about human beings. As when we define &#039;flying&#039; as moving through the air, and then jumping up and down and saying &amp;quot;look, I&#039;m flying!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::2. Pareidolia: a psychological phenomenon that causes people to see patterns, objects, or meaning in ambiguous or unrelated stimuli&lt;br /&gt;
::3. If you can&#039;t spot irony, you&#039;re not intelligent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: The Free Will Problem and the Problem of the Machine Will==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computers cannot have a will, because computers &#039;&#039;don&#039;t give a damn&#039;&#039;. Therefore there can be no machine ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather&#039; says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” &#039;&#039;Fortune&#039;&#039;, June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Implications of the absence of a machine will:&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem of the singularity (when machines will take over from humans) will not arise&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality will never be realized [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Digital-Immortality-2023 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:There can be no AI ethics (only: ethics governing human beings when they use AI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the basis of ethics as applied to humans?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALFAI-2 Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;Freedom: An Impossible Reality&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Landgrebe-Ethics Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/EiBBS8ueyz4 Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Utilitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
:Value ethics&lt;br /&gt;
:Responsiblity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No responsibility without objectifying intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On what basis should we build an AI ethics? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On why AI ethics is (a) impossible, (b) unnecessary &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Readings: &lt;br /&gt;
:Moor: [https://philosophynow.org/issues/72/Four_Kinds_of_Ethical_Robots Four kinds of ethical robots]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: No AI Ethics &lt;br /&gt;
:Crane: [https://iai.tv/articles/the-ai-ethics-hoax-auid-1762?_auid=2020 The AI Ethics Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: The Ontology of Consciousness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:John Searle&lt;br /&gt;
::On consciousness: the Chinese Room Argument&lt;br /&gt;
::Searle and Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Neuroscience and consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_being_you_a_new_science_of_consciousness Anil Seth, &#039;&#039;Being You: A New Science of Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02192-y Making AI meaningful again]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALWTM Raymond Tallis, &#039;&#039;Why the Mind is not a Computer&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALTEA Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;The Explicit Animal: A Defence of Human Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Featuring [https://johnbeverley.com/ John Beverley]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transcription-Debate-1 Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debating the following motions: &lt;br /&gt;
:Philosophy is irrelevant to ontology engineering &lt;br /&gt;
::[https://buffalo.box.com/v/use-mention-confusion The use-mention confusion]&lt;br /&gt;
:Mappings merely give extra life to bad ontologies &lt;br /&gt;
:AI fear is justified&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO is too slow to react&lt;br /&gt;
:Knowledge graphs cannot prevent hallucinations&lt;br /&gt;
:There can never be AGI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Strategies for leveraging ontologies and knowledge graphs to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models and address their limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI] with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An introduction to the statistical foundations of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-the-Future Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Statistical-Foundations-of-AI Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The types of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Deterministic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Good old fashioned AI (GOFAI)&lt;br /&gt;
:Basic stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::How regression works&lt;br /&gt;
:Advanced stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Neural networks and deep learning&lt;br /&gt;
:Hybrid&lt;br /&gt;
::Neurosymbolic AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Background reading: &#039;&#039;Why machines will never rule the world&#039;&#039;, 1e chapter 8, 2e chapter 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/UzHTEMxgKEc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture10Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Debate2-Transcription Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will combining the semantically rich architectures provided by ontologies and knowledge graphs with the generative strengths of LLMs provide a path towards more explainable artificial intelligence systems, more trustworthy output, and a deeper understanding of vulnerabilities arising from integrated architectures?&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality is idiotic&lt;br /&gt;
:We should allow AI research to proceed unregulated&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if you think AGI is impossible, you should treat robots at certain levels of sophistication as moral agents&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;OWL semantics&#039; have nothing to do with the semantics of ordinary language&lt;br /&gt;
:AI will take away our jobs&lt;br /&gt;
:There will never be driverless cars&lt;br /&gt;
:Science is not ready for software, let alone AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outlines the current landscape of ontology-based AI enhancement strategies, highlighting what goes well and what goes poorly, and why ontology engineering is necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://quantumzeitgeist.com/haghighi-stanford-demonstrates-ontological-bias-in-chatgpt-image-generation-via-root-depiction/ Ontological Assumptions in AI Outputs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==April 1: Deadline for submission to BS of starting drafts for your essays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 2000 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 2000 + 3000 words / 1000 + 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: On Hallucinations and Political Correctness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lecture by [https://x.com/JobstLandgrebe?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Jobst Landgrebe] on Why machines will never stop hallucinating:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Slides-Hallucinating Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In current-day culture, concerns are raised when LLMs responds with symbol or pixel sequences which are seen as deviating from social norms of political correctness or wokeness -- or in other words, when they say the unsayable. Further problems are riased for LLM technology by the inconvenient fact of hallucinations, since this prevents their usage for task automation. LLM architects and engineers try to prevent both types of events. This talk shows why it is impossible to ensure that LLMs do not hallucinate or speak the unspeakable, drawing on arguments from the theory of computation (Turing decision/Rice theorem, Gödel&#039;s First Incompleteness Theorem).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Literature: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10719 Glukhov et. al 2023], LLM Censorship: A Machine Learning Challenge or a Computer Security Problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05746 Banerjee et al. 2024], LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf Apple, The Illusion of Thinking]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: Landgrebe on the Replication Crisis. Jacko on the Ontological Foundations of Proxemics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: &#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Ontological Foundations of Proxemics&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lectuer12-Jacko-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Jacko-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proxemics is the study of spatial behaviour in interpersonal communication. It rests on a set of implicit and explicit assumptions about the nature of space, embodiment, intentionality, and meaning. This presentation aims to articulate these assumptions and outline a conceptual framework for understanding proxemics as an ontologically grounded discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background on the replication crisis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 The replication problems which arise when AI applied in scientific research]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Is Psychology Finished?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1983994242272993592 Bayer tested some findings and only achieved a 21% replication rate for biomedical studies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI]&#039;&#039;, October 2024, with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: Landgrebe on machine intelligence. Jacko on psychopathic AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Why we cannot create intelligence inside a machine&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jobst-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Landgrebe-Limits Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Timothy W. Coleman: Beyond the Limits of AI: Ontology as a Framework for Good System Design (Student presentation)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael Behun III: The Paradox within Artificial Intelligence Development&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Are intelligent machines psychopathic by design?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jacko-Pathology Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two major paradigms in clinical psychology. The first treats mental and personality disorders as disturbances of an inner life: of subjective experience, affect, and self-awareness. This view cannot be meaningfully applied to artificial systems, for which no such subjectivity is given. The second paradigm is behavioural and functional. Here disorders, especially personality disorders, are defined as stable, recurrent patterns of behaviour, cognition, and interpersonal functioning that deviate from expected norms and impair adaptation. Psychopathy in this framework is a cluster of observable traits: persistent violation of social rules, instrumental treatment of others, chronically shallow or incongruent emotional expression, irresponsibility, and a striking absence of anxiety or inhibition in situations that normally elicit it. In this talk I adopt the second, behavioural paradigm and extend it to artificial systems, introducingthe notion of &#039;&#039;&#039;AI quasi-personality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14: Oral presentations (Compulsory for all students)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this class is &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background Material on AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to AI for Philosophers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmiY8_XVvzs Why not robot cops? Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-not-robot-cops Why not robot cops? Slides] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to Philosophy for Computer Scientists&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-is-philosophy Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Crash-Course-Introduction Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.cp.eng.chula.ac.th/~prabhas/teaching/cbs-it-seminar/2012/aiphil-mccarthy.pdf John McCarthy, &amp;quot;What has AI in common with philosophy?&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cosmosandtaxis.org/ct-1256/ Companion volume to &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Interviews_and_podcasts_on_%27%27Why_Machines_Will_Never_Rule_the_World%27%27 Podcasts and interviews on &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Learning Outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Comprehend the Architecture and Operation of Large Language Models: Explain the basic design and functioning of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Define and use correctly key terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Evaluate the Theoretical and Practical Limits of AI: Explain the limitations of AI systems as applications of Turing-computable mathematics. Critically assess claims about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the “singularity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Examine Theories of Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Simulation: Explain why machines lack intentionality and subjective experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Understand Ethical and Normative Dimensions of AI: Explain why AI systems cannot possess will, intention, or moral responsibility, and differentiate between AI ethics and ethics of AI use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Apply Ontology-Based Strategies for AI Enhancement: Explain how ontologies and knowledge graphs can improve the explainability, consistency, and interoperability of AI systems. Identify strengths and weaknesses of ontology-based and neurosymbolic AI approaches.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=174</id>
		<title>Ontology and AI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=174"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T21:02:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;PHI 637 Ontology and AI Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spring 2026 - PHI637SEM-SMI2 - Special Topics: Ontology and Artificial Intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks 1-13 Asynchronous &lt;br /&gt;
Week 14 Synchronous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: [https://ontology.buffalo.edu/Smith Barry Smith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The course program below is divided into numbered weeks. The information for each week begins with links to that week&#039;s main video together with the underlying slides. (Transcriptions of the video will be added in the course of the semester). There is also additional background material which is provided as a starting point for further explorations on the part of each student. You should feel free to ignore those items in this background material which you do not find of interest.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a remote asynchronous course. Student presentations will be scheduled in a synchronous session towards the end of April. Additional, informal synchronous sessions may be organized during the course of the semester. One-on-one sessions with Dr Smith can be organised on request to phismith@buffalo.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get a grade for this class you need to submit to Dr Smith an essay on a topic of your choice relating to the interactions between ontology and AI, with one or other topics documented below as your starting point. On or before March 1 you should send an email to Dr Smith with a one-paragraph outline of your topic. Feel free to contact Dr Smith if you are unsure of what your topic should be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All enrolled students must email to BS a Starting Draft version of their essay by April 1 at the latest. Further drafts may be needed in response to Dr Smith&#039;s editorial comments. Students must submit a final, full version of their essay and of the associated powerpoint deck by May 1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Essay word length requirements are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 2500 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 2500 + 3500 words / starting draft: 1000 + 1000 words &lt;br /&gt;
:Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / starting draft: 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3-credit-hour students may submit one single essay with the corresponding combined word count.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grading will be assigned according to the following division:&lt;br /&gt;
:Essay(s): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Presentation (and accompanying powerpoint deck): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Class Participation (responses to presentations): 20%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;AI Policy&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The starting draft of your essay, to be submitted to BS on or before April 1, should be your own work. This means no use of LLMs. All students are, however, welcome thereafter to use LLMs on polishing their starting drafts, providing that they follow these rules: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 1: Include a declaration on p. 1 to the effect that the essay was written entirely without any sort of AI assistance. I reserve the right to use software tools, but also my own judgment, to ensure this draft was written by you. Grades under option 1. will be determined by the quality of your essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 2 is in multiple steps:&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 1. Create a draft in your own words of an essay that is about half as long as your target length length. This should be a substantive draft, but it can contain for example rough notes pointing to further lines of development. Not only this initial draft, but also all further steps in the list below, should rely on study by you of the relevant literature. Both your draft and your final essay should accordingly contain lists of references.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 2. Submit this draft to me at phismith@buffalo.edu by the middle of the semester.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 3. You create a new prompt using your draft as an attachment with an instruction such as: &#039;&#039;show me how I can improve the attached&#039;&#039;. This will start a potentially long process of improvements in your essay incorporating further contributions from you together with assistance from the LLM. You should attempt to use prompts to manipulate the style of the LLM output in a direction of a style appropriate to serious academic research, with references, quotations, definitions, as needed. Most importantly: you should be aware that LLMs often make errors (called &#039;hallucinations&#039;), for example inventing references in the literature which do not in fact exist.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 4. the LLM has been keeping track of everything you tell it to do since you started the newchat. When you think you might be ready to submit, use the LLM save function to generate a URI linking to all the interactions thus far – effectively a log of your process. This log, together with your initial and final essay will for part of what will be evaluated for your grade.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 5. When you truly are ready to submit, press save for one last time and take a note of the link; send me this link, together with your completed essay, and with any notes on features of the log you which to point out -- for example requests that I ignore specific chains of prompts because they proved to be dead ends.&lt;br /&gt;
Grades under Option 2 will be determined on the basis of (a) originality of the initial draft, (b) creativity of your prompts, (c) quality of final essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at the synchronous session featuring student presentations around May 1 is compulsory for all students&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology (also called &#039;metaphysics&#039;) is a subfield of philosophy which aims to establich the kinds of entities in the world -- including both the material and the mental world -- and the relations between them. Applied ontology applies philosophical ideas and methods to support those who are collecting, using, comparing, refining, evaluating or (today above all) generating data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as &#039;intelligent&#039;. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create what is called &#039;&#039;General Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039; (AGI), by which is meant an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being. ChatGT and other large language models (LLMs) attempt to generate data from other data, where the latter are obtained for example by crawling the internet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Required reading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-machines-1e Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]&#039;&#039; (Routledge 2022; revised and enlarged second edition, published in 2025), [https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9939883749704803&amp;amp;context=L&amp;amp;vid=01SUNY_BUF:everything&amp;amp;lang=en&amp;amp;search_scope=UBSUNY&amp;amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;amp;tab=EverythingUBSUNY&amp;amp;query=any,contains,jobst%20landgrebe available online from UB Library] . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also offer [https://www.routledge.com/Why-Machines-Will-Never-Rule-the-World-Artificial-Intelligence-without-Fear/Landgrebe-Smith/p/book/9781032941400?srsltid=AfmBOoor0YJakTv88G0LUq0tWvBh3YS604AK0Gfr8Bd0YYgsgq1U6J7y here] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: The Glory and the Misery of Large Language Models==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: A brief introduction to Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. Focusing on booth positive and negative aspects of how they work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMD_1yA3TXk Video1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Glory-and-Misery Slides1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/s/ufnf1gwozzzd3hpmcmmbz2j7l0dzht56 Transcript]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2: GPT-5 and the French and Indian War: Teach yourself history with ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm4mCgAsI6I Video2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/French-and-Indian-War Slides2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions to ponder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What does &#039;stochastic&#039; mean in &#039;stochastic AI&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is &#039;scaling&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are hallucinations?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Good Old Fashioned (Logical, Symbolic) AI to ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-history Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Slides-Lecture-2 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its inception in the last century, AI has enjoyed repeated cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment (AI summers and winters). Recent successes of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened a new era of popularization of AI. For the first time, AI tools have been created that are immediately available to the wider population, who for the first time can have real hands-on experience of what AI can do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this first lecture we will address the origins of AI in Stanford University in the 1970s and &#039;80s, and specifically in the work on common-sense ontology of Patrick Hayes and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics to be dealt with include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is ontology?&lt;br /&gt;
:From Aristotle to 20th century philosophical ontology&lt;br /&gt;
:Patrick Hayes, Naive Physics and ontology-based robotics&lt;br /&gt;
:Doug Lennat and the CYC (for &#039;enCYClopedia&#039; project)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why CYC failed&lt;br /&gt;
:Why ontology is still important to AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/History-of-AI History of AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://utt.hal.science/hal-02954862v1/document Where do ontologies come from?]&lt;br /&gt;
:See also references to Hayes in [https://www.physicalism.com/osr.pdf &#039;&#039;Everything must go&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: Limits of AI? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Video3 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Slides3 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Surveys the technical fundamentals of AI: Methods, mathematics, usage &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Natural and engineered systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The ontology of systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Complex systems &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The limits of Turing machines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Why AI cannot model complex systems adequately and synoptically, and why they therefore cannot reach a level of intelligence equal to that of human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusions: &lt;br /&gt;
:AI is a family of algorithms to automate repetitive events&lt;br /&gt;
:Deep neural networks have nothing to do with neurons&lt;br /&gt;
:AI is not artificial &#039;intelligence&#039;; it is a branch of mathematics in which the attempt is made to use the Turing machine to its limits by using gigantically large amounts of data&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/opinion/ai-gpt5-rethinking.html?unlocked_article_code=1.jE8.eAwg.I1yx07GQmDbh&amp;amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;amp;referringSource=articleShare&amp;amp;utm_source=substack&amp;amp;utm_medium=email Marcus on superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:https://www.wheresyoured.at/&lt;br /&gt;
:https://x.com/jobstlandgrebe?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
:https://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Ecological Psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jobst Landgrebe on mathematical definitions of consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Surveys the spectrum of transhumanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Debunks the feasibility of radically improving human beings via technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Explains why Sam Altman and other AI gods are so passionate about creating Artificial General Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. J. J. Gibson, direct realism, and how our behavior is tuned to affordances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-acronym-behind-our-wildest-ai-dreams-and-nightmares/ TESCREALISM]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Mind-Body Transhumanism and the Mind-Body Problem]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AI and the meaning of life:&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf There is no general AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Lugano-2025 Landgrebe on Transhumanism]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://michaelnotebook.com/xriskbrief/index.html Considering the existential risk of Artificial Superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology of the Eruv (why it would take all the fun out of real estate if everyone could live next door to John Lennon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we living in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:David Chalmers&#039; &#039;&#039;[https://www.amazon.com/Reality-Virtual-Worlds-Problems-Philosophy/dp/0393635805 Reality+]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Intelligence-Lugano-2025 Are we living in a simulation?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Living-in-a-Simulation On Chalmers on &#039;&#039;Reality&#039;&#039;+?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-in-the-Future The Future of Artificial Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine consciousness: Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are &#039;&#039;about&#039;&#039; something.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Lugano-Machine-Will Slides] / :[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Machine-Consciousness-BS-2025 Video]: Can a machine be conscious?&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt-JzB50sJE Searle&#039;s Chinese Room Argument]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs] &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918 Making AI Meaningful Again]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1258.pdf Søgaard: Do Language Models Have Semantics?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16582 Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for Classifying Objections and Constraints]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: AGI, Behavior Settings and Distributed Cognition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Niches Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Question-and-answer session with Jérémy Ravenel of [https://home.naas.ai naas.ai]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions addressed include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are you doing with BFO and LLMs? &lt;br /&gt;
:Can you rely on BFO still being operative in the proper way even after a new release of an LLM?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeremyravenel_why-is-bfo-so-powerful-bfo-basic-formal-activity-7250607560976732163-d7tZ/ Why is BFO so powerful?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-Creativity Explicit, implicit, practical, personal and tacit knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Practical-knowledge Personal knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==March 1: Submit to Dr Smith a one-paragraph description of the topic of your essay==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: Towards a theory of intelligence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/ontology-and-AI-slides-6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture6-AI-Ontology Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Definitions of intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. the ability to adapt to new situations (applies both to humans and to animals) &lt;br /&gt;
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Ryan Muldoon, &amp;quot;Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Philosophy Compass&#039;&#039; 8 (2):117-125 (2013) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team made of humans and AI systems be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See M. Stelmaszak, et al., &amp;quot;Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human-Algorithm Relations&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Journal of Management Studies&#039;&#039;, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 2. What do IQ tests measure?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-do-IQ-tests-2022 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human and animal intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyeAbcDDgg Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/file/1889978901204?v=Territoriality Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Readings:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Linda S. Gottfredson. [https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994WSJmainstream.pdf Mainstream Science on Intelligence]. In: &#039;&#039;Intelligence&#039;&#039; 24 (1997), pp. 13–23.&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The context-dependence of human intelligence, and why AGI is impossible&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 3. Affordances, tacit knowledge, cognitive niches, and the background of Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Harry Heft, &#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/shared/static/bbaq21q115pi8xpa5744ku1ftuuj6je0.pdf Ecological Psychology in Context]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/lS4-QSR1sNk?t=791 There&#039;s no &#039;I&#039; in &#039;AI&#039;], Steven Pemberton, Amsterdam, December 12, 2024 &lt;br /&gt;
::1. &#039;&#039;Ersatz&#039;&#039; definitions: using words like &#039;thinks&#039; as in &#039;the machine is thinking&#039;, but with meanings quite different from those we use when talking about human beings. As when we define &#039;flying&#039; as moving through the air, and then jumping up and down and saying &amp;quot;look, I&#039;m flying!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::2. Pareidolia: a psychological phenomenon that causes people to see patterns, objects, or meaning in ambiguous or unrelated stimuli&lt;br /&gt;
::3. If you can&#039;t spot irony, you&#039;re not intelligent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: The Free Will Problem and the Problem of the Machine Will==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computers cannot have a will, because computers &#039;&#039;don&#039;t give a damn&#039;&#039;. Therefore there can be no machine ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather&#039; says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” &#039;&#039;Fortune&#039;&#039;, June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Implications of the absence of a machine will:&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem of the singularity (when machines will take over from humans) will not arise&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality will never be realized [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Digital-Immortality-2023 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:There can be no AI ethics (only: ethics governing human beings when they use AI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the basis of ethics as applied to humans?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALFAI-2 Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;Freedom: An Impossible Reality&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Landgrebe-Ethics Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/EiBBS8ueyz4 Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Utilitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
:Value ethics&lt;br /&gt;
:Responsiblity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No responsibility without objectifying intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On what basis should we build an AI ethics? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On why AI ethics is (a) impossible, (b) unnecessary &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Readings: &lt;br /&gt;
:Moor: [https://philosophynow.org/issues/72/Four_Kinds_of_Ethical_Robots Four kinds of ethical robots]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: No AI Ethics &lt;br /&gt;
:Crane: [https://iai.tv/articles/the-ai-ethics-hoax-auid-1762?_auid=2020 The AI Ethics Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: The Ontology of Consciousness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:John Searle&lt;br /&gt;
::On consciousness: the Chinese Room Argument&lt;br /&gt;
::Searle and Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Neuroscience and consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_being_you_a_new_science_of_consciousness Anil Seth, &#039;&#039;Being You: A New Science of Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02192-y Making AI meaningful again]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALWTM Raymond Tallis, &#039;&#039;Why the Mind is not a Computer&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALTEA Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;The Explicit Animal: A Defence of Human Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Featuring [https://johnbeverley.com/ John Beverley]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transcription-Debate-1 Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debating the following motions: &lt;br /&gt;
:Philosophy is irrelevant to ontology engineering &lt;br /&gt;
::[https://buffalo.box.com/v/use-mention-confusion The use-mention confusion]&lt;br /&gt;
:Mappings merely give extra life to bad ontologies &lt;br /&gt;
:AI fear is justified&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO is too slow to react&lt;br /&gt;
:Knowledge graphs cannot prevent hallucinations&lt;br /&gt;
:There can never be AGI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Strategies for leveraging ontologies and knowledge graphs to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models and address their limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI] with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An introduction to the statistical foundations of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-the-Future Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Statistical-Foundations-of-AI Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The types of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Deterministic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Good old fashioned AI (GOFAI)&lt;br /&gt;
:Basic stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::How regression works&lt;br /&gt;
:Advanced stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Neural networks and deep learning&lt;br /&gt;
:Hybrid&lt;br /&gt;
::Neurosymbolic AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Background reading: &#039;&#039;Why machines will never rule the world&#039;&#039;, 1e chapter 8, 2e chapter 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/UzHTEMxgKEc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture10Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Debate2-Transcription Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will combining the semantically rich architectures provided by ontologies and knowledge graphs with the generative strengths of LLMs provide a path towards more explainable artificial intelligence systems, more trustworthy output, and a deeper understanding of vulnerabilities arising from integrated architectures?&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality is idiotic&lt;br /&gt;
:We should allow AI research to proceed unregulated&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if you think AGI is impossible, you should treat robots at certain levels of sophistication as moral agents&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;OWL semantics&#039; have nothing to do with the semantics of ordinary language&lt;br /&gt;
:AI will take away our jobs&lt;br /&gt;
:There will never be driverless cars&lt;br /&gt;
:Science is not ready for software, let alone AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outlines the current landscape of ontology-based AI enhancement strategies, highlighting what goes well and what goes poorly, and why ontology engineering is necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://quantumzeitgeist.com/haghighi-stanford-demonstrates-ontological-bias-in-chatgpt-image-generation-via-root-depiction/ Ontological Assumptions in AI Outputs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==April 1: Deadline for submission to BS of starting drafts for your essays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 2000 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 2000 + 3000 words / 1000 + 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: On Hallucinations and Political Correctness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lecture by [https://x.com/JobstLandgrebe?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Jobst Landgrebe] on Why machines will never stop hallucinating:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Slides-Hallucinating Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In current-day culture, concerns are raised when LLMs responds with symbol or pixel sequences which are seen as deviating from social norms of political correctness or wokeness -- or in other words, when they say the unsayable. Further problems are riased for LLM technology by the inconvenient fact of hallucinations, since this prevents their usage for task automation. LLM architects and engineers try to prevent both types of events. This talk shows why it is impossible to ensure that LLMs do not hallucinate or speak the unspeakable, drawing on arguments from the theory of computation (Turing decision/Rice theorem, Gödel&#039;s First Incompleteness Theorem).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Literature: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10719 Glukhov et. al 2023], LLM Censorship: A Machine Learning Challenge or a Computer Security Problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05746 Banerjee et al. 2024], LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf Apple, The Illusion of Thinking]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: Landgrebe on the Replication Crisis. Jacko on the Ontological Foundations of Proxemics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: &#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Ontological Foundations of Proxemics&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lectuer12-Jacko-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Jacko-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proxemics is the study of spatial behaviour in interpersonal communication. It rests on a set of implicit and explicit assumptions about the nature of space, embodiment, intentionality, and meaning. This presentation aims to articulate these assumptions and outline a conceptual framework for understanding proxemics as an ontologically grounded discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background on the replication crisis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 The replication problems which arise when AI applied in scientific research]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Is Psychology Finished?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1983994242272993592 Bayer tested some findings and only achieved a 21% replication rate for biomedical studies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI]&#039;&#039;, October 2024, with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: Landgrebe on machine intelligence. Jacko on psychopathic AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Why we cannot create intelligence inside a machine&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jobst-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Landgrebe-Limits Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Timothy W. Coleman: Beyond the Limits of AI: Ontology as a Framework for Good System Design (Student presentation)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael Behun III: The Paradox within Artificial Intelligence Development&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Are intelligent machines psychopathic by design?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jacko-Pathology Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two major paradigms in clinical psychology. The first treats mental and personality disorders as disturbances of an inner life: of subjective experience, affect, and self-awareness. This view cannot be meaningfully applied to artificial systems, for which no such subjectivity is given. The second paradigm is behavioural and functional. Here disorders, especially personality disorders, are defined as stable, recurrent patterns of behaviour, cognition, and interpersonal functioning that deviate from expected norms and impair adaptation. Psychopathy in this framework is a cluster of observable traits: persistent violation of social rules, instrumental treatment of others, chronically shallow or incongruent emotional expression, irresponsibility, and a striking absence of anxiety or inhibition in situations that normally elicit it. In this talk I adopt the second, behavioural paradigm and extend it to artificial systems, introducingthe notion of &#039;&#039;&#039;AI quasi-personality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14: Oral presentations (Compulsory for all students)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this class is &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background Material on AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to AI for Philosophers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmiY8_XVvzs Why not robot cops? Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-not-robot-cops Why not robot cops? Slides] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to Philosophy for Computer Scientists&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-is-philosophy Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Crash-Course-Introduction Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.cp.eng.chula.ac.th/~prabhas/teaching/cbs-it-seminar/2012/aiphil-mccarthy.pdf John McCarthy, &amp;quot;What has AI in common with philosophy?&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cosmosandtaxis.org/ct-1256/ Companion volume to &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Interviews_and_podcasts_on_%27%27Why_Machines_Will_Never_Rule_the_World%27%27 Podcasts and interviews on &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Learning Outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Comprehend the Architecture and Operation of Large Language Models: Explain the basic design and functioning of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Define and use correctly key terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Evaluate the Theoretical and Practical Limits of AI: Explain the limitations of AI systems as applications of Turing-computable mathematics. Critically assess claims about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the “singularity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Examine Theories of Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Simulation: Explain why machines lack intentionality and subjective experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Understand Ethical and Normative Dimensions of AI: Explain why AI systems cannot possess will, intention, or moral responsibility, and differentiate between AI ethics and ethics of AI use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Apply Ontology-Based Strategies for AI Enhancement: Explain how ontologies and knowledge graphs can improve the explainability, consistency, and interoperability of AI systems. Identify strengths and weaknesses of ontology-based and neurosymbolic AI approaches.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=173</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=173"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T19:07:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A Series of 6 Videos */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 BFO Tutorial (2019): A Series of 6 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each session, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to one of the video or videos scheduled for that session, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=172</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=172"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T19:06:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 Videos */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 A Series of 6 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each session, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to one of the video or videos scheduled for that session, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=171</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=171"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T18:46:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Grading */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each session, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to one of the video or videos scheduled for that session, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=170</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=170"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T17:40:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Grading */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each session, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of the video or videos scheduled for that session, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=169</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=169"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T17:32:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 12 (April 15) The Emotion Ontology, Why Most Ontologies Fail */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=168</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=168"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T17:30:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 12 (April 15) The Ontology of Emotions, Why Most Ontologies Fail */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://youtu.be/18php_34s-M The Emotion Ontology], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=167</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=167"/>
		<updated>2026-02-16T16:54:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 12 (April 15) Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects, Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases, Why Most Ontologies Fail */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://studio.youtube.com/video/BYAT8vHZ8ik/edit The Ontology of Emotions], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=166</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=166"/>
		<updated>2026-02-15T20:34:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Supplementary Videos */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU remember to use Closed Captions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=165</id>
		<title>Ontology and AI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Ontology_and_AI&amp;diff=165"/>
		<updated>2026-02-12T23:58:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* April 11: Deadline for submission to BS of starting drafts for your essays */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;PHI 637 Ontology and AI Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spring 2026 - PHI637SEM-SMI2 - Special Topics: Ontology and Artificial Intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks 1-13 Asynchronous &lt;br /&gt;
Week 14 Synchronous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: [https://ontology.buffalo.edu/Smith Barry Smith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The course program below is divided into numbered weeks. The information for each week begins with links to that week&#039;s main video together with the underlying slides. (Transcriptions of the video will be added in the course of the semester). There is also additional background material which is provided as a starting point for further explorations on the part of each student. You should feel free to ignore those items in this background material which you do not find of interest.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a remote asynchronous course. Student presentations will be scheduled in a synchronous session towards the end of April. Additional, informal synchronous sessions may be organized during the course of the semester. One-on-one sessions with Dr Smith can be organised on request to phismith@buffalo.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get a grade for this class you need to submit to Dr Smith an essay on a topic of your choice relating to the interactions between ontology and AI, with one or other topics documented below as your starting point. On or before March 1 you should send an email to Dr Smith with a one-paragraph outline of your topic. Feel free to contact Dr Smith if you are unsure of what your topic should be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All enrolled students must email to BS a Starting Draft version of their essay by April 1 at the latest. Further drafts may be needed in response to Dr Smith&#039;s editorial comments. Students must submit a final, full version of their essay and of the associated powerpoint deck by May 1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Essay word length requirements are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 2500 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 2500 + 3500 words / starting draft: 1000 + 1000 words &lt;br /&gt;
:Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / starting draft: 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
::2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
::3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3-credit-hour students may submit one single essay with the corresponding combined word count.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grading will be assigned according to the following division:&lt;br /&gt;
:Essay(s): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Presentation (and accompanying powerpoint deck): 40%&lt;br /&gt;
:Class Participation (responses to presentations): 20%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;AI Policy&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The starting draft of your essay, to be submitted to BS on or before April 1, should be your own work. This means no use of LLMs. All students are, however, welcome thereafter to use LLMs on polishing their starting drafts, providing that they follow these rules: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 1: Include a declaration on p. 1 to the effect that the essay was written entirely without any sort of AI assistance. I reserve the right to use software tools, but also my own judgment, to ensure this draft was written by you. Grades under option 1. will be determined by the quality of your essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Option 2 is in multiple steps:&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 1. Create a draft in your own words of an essay that is about half as long as your target length length. This should be a substantive draft, but it can contain for example rough notes pointing to further lines of development. Not only this initial draft, but also all further steps in the list below, should rely on study by you of the relevant literature. Both your draft and your final essay should accordingly contain lists of references.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 2. Submit this draft to me at phismith@buffalo.edu by the middle of the semester.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 3. You create a new prompt using your draft as an attachment with an instruction such as: &#039;&#039;show me how I can improve the attached&#039;&#039;. This will start a potentially long process of improvements in your essay incorporating further contributions from you together with assistance from the LLM. You should attempt to use prompts to manipulate the style of the LLM output in a direction of a style appropriate to serious academic research, with references, quotations, definitions, as needed. Most importantly: you should be aware that LLMs often make errors (called &#039;hallucinations&#039;), for example inventing references in the literature which do not in fact exist.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 4. the LLM has been keeping track of everything you tell it to do since you started the newchat. When you think you might be ready to submit, use the LLM save function to generate a URI linking to all the interactions thus far – effectively a log of your process. This log, together with your initial and final essay will for part of what will be evaluated for your grade.&lt;br /&gt;
:Step 5. When you truly are ready to submit, press save for one last time and take a note of the link; send me this link, together with your completed essay, and with any notes on features of the log you which to point out -- for example requests that I ignore specific chains of prompts because they proved to be dead ends.&lt;br /&gt;
Grades under Option 2 will be determined on the basis of (a) originality of the initial draft, (b) creativity of your prompts, (c) quality of final essay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at the synchronous session featuring student presentations around May 1 is compulsory for all students&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology (also called &#039;metaphysics&#039;) is a subfield of philosophy which aims to establich the kinds of entities in the world -- including both the material and the mental world -- and the relations between them. Applied ontology applies philosophical ideas and methods to support those who are collecting, using, comparing, refining, evaluating or (today above all) generating data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the subfield of Computer Science devoted to developing programs that enable computers to display behavior that can (broadly) be characterized as &#039;intelligent&#039;. On the strong version, the ultimate goal of AI is to create what is called &#039;&#039;General Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039; (AGI), by which is meant an artificial system that is as intelligent as a human being. ChatGT and other large language models (LLMs) attempt to generate data from other data, where the latter are obtained for example by crawling the internet. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Required reading&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-machines-1e Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence without Fear]&#039;&#039; (Routledge 2022; revised and enlarged second edition, published in 2025), [https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9939883749704803&amp;amp;context=L&amp;amp;vid=01SUNY_BUF:everything&amp;amp;lang=en&amp;amp;search_scope=UBSUNY&amp;amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;amp;tab=EverythingUBSUNY&amp;amp;query=any,contains,jobst%20landgrebe available online from UB Library] . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also offer [https://www.routledge.com/Why-Machines-Will-Never-Rule-the-World-Artificial-Intelligence-without-Fear/Landgrebe-Smith/p/book/9781032941400?srsltid=AfmBOoor0YJakTv88G0LUq0tWvBh3YS604AK0Gfr8Bd0YYgsgq1U6J7y here] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1: The Glory and the Misery of Large Language Models==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: A brief introduction to Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. Focusing on booth positive and negative aspects of how they work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMD_1yA3TXk Video1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Glory-and-Misery Slides1]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/s/ufnf1gwozzzd3hpmcmmbz2j7l0dzht56 Transcript]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2: GPT-5 and the French and Indian War: Teach yourself history with ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm4mCgAsI6I Video2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/French-and-Indian-War Slides2]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions to ponder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What does &#039;stochastic&#039; mean in &#039;stochastic AI&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is &#039;scaling&#039;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are hallucinations?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2: Ontology and the History of AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: From Good Old Fashioned (Logical, Symbolic) AI to ChatGPT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-history Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Slides-Lecture-2 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its inception in the last century, AI has enjoyed repeated cycles of enthusiasm and disappointment (AI summers and winters). Recent successes of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened a new era of popularization of AI. For the first time, AI tools have been created that are immediately available to the wider population, who for the first time can have real hands-on experience of what AI can do. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this first lecture we will address the origins of AI in Stanford University in the 1970s and &#039;80s, and specifically in the work on common-sense ontology of Patrick Hayes and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics to be dealt with include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is ontology?&lt;br /&gt;
:From Aristotle to 20th century philosophical ontology&lt;br /&gt;
:Patrick Hayes, Naive Physics and ontology-based robotics&lt;br /&gt;
:Doug Lennat and the CYC (for &#039;enCYClopedia&#039; project)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why CYC failed&lt;br /&gt;
:Why ontology is still important to AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/History-of-AI History of AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://utt.hal.science/hal-02954862v1/document Where do ontologies come from?]&lt;br /&gt;
:See also references to Hayes in [https://www.physicalism.com/osr.pdf &#039;&#039;Everything must go&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3: Limits of AI? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Video3 Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-Slides3 Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Surveys the technical fundamentals of AI: Methods, mathematics, usage &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Natural and engineered systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The ontology of systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Complex systems &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The limits of Turing machines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Why AI cannot model complex systems adequately and synoptically, and why they therefore cannot reach a level of intelligence equal to that of human beings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusions: &lt;br /&gt;
:AI is a family of algorithms to automate repetitive events&lt;br /&gt;
:Deep neural networks have nothing to do with neurons&lt;br /&gt;
:AI is not artificial &#039;intelligence&#039;; it is a branch of mathematics in which the attempt is made to use the Turing machine to its limits by using gigantically large amounts of data&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/opinion/ai-gpt5-rethinking.html?unlocked_article_code=1.jE8.eAwg.I1yx07GQmDbh&amp;amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;amp;referringSource=articleShare&amp;amp;utm_source=substack&amp;amp;utm_medium=email Marcus on superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:https://www.wheresyoured.at/&lt;br /&gt;
:https://x.com/jobstlandgrebe?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
:https://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4: Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Ecological Psychology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Ontology-and-AI-4-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jobst Landgrebe on mathematical definitions of consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Surveys the spectrum of transhumanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Debunks the feasibility of radically improving human beings via technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Explains why Sam Altman and other AI gods are so passionate about creating Artificial General Intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. J. J. Gibson, direct realism, and how our behavior is tuned to affordances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-acronym-behind-our-wildest-ai-dreams-and-nightmares/ TESCREALISM]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Mind-Body Transhumanism and the Mind-Body Problem]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AI and the meaning of life:&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf There is no general AI]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transhumanism-Lugano-2025 Landgrebe on Transhumanism]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://michaelnotebook.com/xriskbrief/index.html Considering the existential risk of Artificial Superintelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
Ontology of the Eruv (why it would take all the fun out of real estate if everyone could live next door to John Lennon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we living in a simulation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:David Chalmers&#039; &#039;&#039;[https://www.amazon.com/Reality-Virtual-Worlds-Problems-Philosophy/dp/0393635805 Reality+]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/We-are-living-in-a-simulation Scott Adams: We are living in a simulation]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Matrix.pdf AI and &#039;&#039;The Matrix&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/6knt5u23f8zloxydvzp5q3c1dzbmimkf Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Intelligence-Lugano-2025 Are we living in a simulation?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Living-in-a-Simulation On Chalmers on &#039;&#039;Reality&#039;&#039;+?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-in-the-Future The Future of Artificial Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine consciousness: Machines cannot have intentionality; they cannot have experiences which are &#039;&#039;about&#039;&#039; something.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BS-Lugano-Machine-Will Slides] / :[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Machine-Consciousness-BS-2025 Video]: Can a machine be conscious?&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt-JzB50sJE Searle&#039;s Chinese Room Argument]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/3413-searle-j-minds-brains-and-programs-1980.pdf Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs] &lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02918 Making AI Meaningful Again]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1258.pdf Søgaard: Do Language Models Have Semantics?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16582 Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for Classifying Objections and Constraints]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5: AGI, Behavior Settings and Distributed Cognition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Niches Video]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture-5-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Question-and-answer session with Jérémy Ravenel of [https://home.naas.ai naas.ai]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions addressed include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What are you doing with BFO and LLMs? &lt;br /&gt;
:Can you rely on BFO still being operative in the proper way even after a new release of an LLM?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeremyravenel_why-is-bfo-so-powerful-bfo-basic-formal-activity-7250607560976732163-d7tZ/ Why is BFO so powerful?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-Creativity Explicit, implicit, practical, personal and tacit knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Practical-knowledge Personal knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==March 1: Submit to Dr Smith a one-paragraph description of the topic of your essay==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6: Towards a theory of intelligence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/ontology-and-AI-slides-6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture6-AI-Ontology Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 1. Definitions of intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A. the ability to adapt to new situations (applies both to humans and to animals) &lt;br /&gt;
:B. a very general mental capability (possessed only by humans) that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a machine be intelligent in either of these senses?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See Ryan Muldoon, &amp;quot;Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Philosophy Compass&#039;&#039; 8 (2):117-125 (2013) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can a team made of humans and AI systems be intelligent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See M. Stelmaszak, et al., &amp;quot;Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human-Algorithm Relations&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Journal of Management Studies&#039;&#039;, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 2. What do IQ tests measure?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-do-IQ-tests-2022 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human and animal intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyeAbcDDgg Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/file/1889978901204?v=Territoriality Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Readings:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Linda S. Gottfredson. [https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994WSJmainstream.pdf Mainstream Science on Intelligence]. In: &#039;&#039;Intelligence&#039;&#039; 24 (1997), pp. 13–23.&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05833.pdf There is no Artificial General Intelligence]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The context-dependence of human intelligence, and why AGI is impossible&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Part 3. Affordances, tacit knowledge, cognitive niches, and the background of Artificial Intelligence&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background material&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Harry Heft, &#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/shared/static/bbaq21q115pi8xpa5744ku1ftuuj6je0.pdf Ecological Psychology in Context]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/lS4-QSR1sNk?t=791 There&#039;s no &#039;I&#039; in &#039;AI&#039;], Steven Pemberton, Amsterdam, December 12, 2024 &lt;br /&gt;
::1. &#039;&#039;Ersatz&#039;&#039; definitions: using words like &#039;thinks&#039; as in &#039;the machine is thinking&#039;, but with meanings quite different from those we use when talking about human beings. As when we define &#039;flying&#039; as moving through the air, and then jumping up and down and saying &amp;quot;look, I&#039;m flying!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::2. Pareidolia: a psychological phenomenon that causes people to see patterns, objects, or meaning in ambiguous or unrelated stimuli&lt;br /&gt;
::3. If you can&#039;t spot irony, you&#039;re not intelligent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7: The Free Will Problem and the Problem of the Machine Will==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture7-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computers cannot have a will, because computers &#039;&#039;don&#039;t give a damn&#039;&#039;. Therefore there can be no machine ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The lack of the giving-a-damn-factor is taken by Yann LeCun as a reason to reject the idea that AI might pose an existential risk to humanity – an AI will have no desire for self-preservation “Almost half of CEOs fear A.I. could destroy humanity five to 10 years from now — but ‘A.I. godfather&#039; says an existential threat is ‘preposterously ridiculous’” &#039;&#039;Fortune&#039;&#039;, June 15, 2023. See also [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01723-5 here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Implications of the absence of a machine will:&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem of the singularity (when machines will take over from humans) will not arise&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality will never be realized [https://buffalo.box.com/v/Digital-Immortality-2023 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:There can be no AI ethics (only: ethics governing human beings when they use AI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the basis of ethics as applied to humans?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALFAI-2 Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;Freedom: An Impossible Reality&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Landgrebe-Ethics Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/EiBBS8ueyz4 Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Utilitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
:Value ethics&lt;br /&gt;
:Responsiblity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No responsibility without objectifying intelligence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On what basis should we build an AI ethics? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On why AI ethics is (a) impossible, (b) unnecessary &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Readings: &lt;br /&gt;
:Moor: [https://philosophynow.org/issues/72/Four_Kinds_of_Ethical_Robots Four kinds of ethical robots]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jobst Landgrebe and Barry Smith: No AI Ethics &lt;br /&gt;
:Crane: [https://iai.tv/articles/the-ai-ethics-hoax-auid-1762?_auid=2020 The AI Ethics Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8: The Ontology of Consciousness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture8-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:John Searle&lt;br /&gt;
::On consciousness: the Chinese Room Argument&lt;br /&gt;
::Searle and Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Neuroscience and consciousness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.ted.com/talks/anil_seth_being_you_a_new_science_of_consciousness Anil Seth, &#039;&#039;Being You: A New Science of Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02192-y Making AI meaningful again]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALWTM Raymond Tallis, &#039;&#039;Why the Mind is not a Computer&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/TALTEA Raymond Tallis: &#039;&#039;The Explicit Animal: A Defence of Human Consciousness&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Featuring [https://johnbeverley.com/ John Beverley]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture9-slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Transcription-Debate-1 Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Debating the following motions: &lt;br /&gt;
:Philosophy is irrelevant to ontology engineering &lt;br /&gt;
::[https://buffalo.box.com/v/use-mention-confusion The use-mention confusion]&lt;br /&gt;
:Mappings merely give extra life to bad ontologies &lt;br /&gt;
:AI fear is justified&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO is too slow to react&lt;br /&gt;
:Knowledge graphs cannot prevent hallucinations&lt;br /&gt;
:There can never be AGI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Background&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:Strategies for leveraging ontologies and knowledge graphs to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models and address their limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI] with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An introduction to the statistical foundations of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/AI-and-the-Future Slides]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Statistical-Foundations-of-AI Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The types of AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Deterministic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Good old fashioned AI (GOFAI)&lt;br /&gt;
:Basic stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::How regression works&lt;br /&gt;
:Advanced stochastic AI&lt;br /&gt;
::Neural networks and deep learning&lt;br /&gt;
:Hybrid&lt;br /&gt;
::Neurosymbolic AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Background reading: &#039;&#039;Why machines will never rule the world&#039;&#039;, 1e chapter 8, 2e chapter 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10: Debates on ontology engineering: Part 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://youtu.be/UzHTEMxgKEc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture10Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Debate2-Transcription Transcription]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will combining the semantically rich architectures provided by ontologies and knowledge graphs with the generative strengths of LLMs provide a path towards more explainable artificial intelligence systems, more trustworthy output, and a deeper understanding of vulnerabilities arising from integrated architectures?&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of digital immortality is idiotic&lt;br /&gt;
:We should allow AI research to proceed unregulated&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if you think AGI is impossible, you should treat robots at certain levels of sophistication as moral agents&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;OWL semantics&#039; have nothing to do with the semantics of ordinary language&lt;br /&gt;
:AI will take away our jobs&lt;br /&gt;
:There will never be driverless cars&lt;br /&gt;
:Science is not ready for software, let alone AI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outlines the current landscape of ontology-based AI enhancement strategies, highlighting what goes well and what goes poorly, and why ontology engineering is necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://quantumzeitgeist.com/haghighi-stanford-demonstrates-ontological-bias-in-chatgpt-image-generation-via-root-depiction/ Ontological Assumptions in AI Outputs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==April 1: Deadline for submission to BS of starting drafts for your essays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PhD candidates: &lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 2000 words / starting draft: 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 2000 + 3000 words / 1000 + 1000 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Masters candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1500 words /starting draft: 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 + 2000 words / 750 + 750 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undergraduate candidates&lt;br /&gt;
:2 credit hours: 1000 words / starting draft: 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
:3 credit hours: 1500 words / 500 + 500 words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11: On Hallucinations and Political Correctness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lecture by [https://x.com/JobstLandgrebe?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Jobst Landgrebe] on Why machines will never stop hallucinating:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture11-Slides-Hallucinating Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In current-day culture, concerns are raised when LLMs responds with symbol or pixel sequences which are seen as deviating from social norms of political correctness or wokeness -- or in other words, when they say the unsayable. Further problems are riased for LLM technology by the inconvenient fact of hallucinations, since this prevents their usage for task automation. LLM architects and engineers try to prevent both types of events. This talk shows why it is impossible to ensure that LLMs do not hallucinate or speak the unspeakable, drawing on arguments from the theory of computation (Turing decision/Rice theorem, Gödel&#039;s First Incompleteness Theorem).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Literature: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10719 Glukhov et. al 2023], LLM Censorship: A Machine Learning Challenge or a Computer Security Problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05746 Banerjee et al. 2024], LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ml-site.cdn-apple.com/papers/the-illusion-of-thinking.pdf Apple, The Illusion of Thinking]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12: Landgrebe on the Replication Crisis. Jacko on the Ontological Foundations of Proxemics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1: &#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Landgrebe-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Ontological Foundations of Proxemics&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lectuer12-Jacko-Video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture12-Jacko-Slides Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proxemics is the study of spatial behaviour in interpersonal communication. It rests on a set of implicit and explicit assumptions about the nature of space, embodiment, intentionality, and meaning. This presentation aims to articulate these assumptions and outline a conceptual framework for understanding proxemics as an ontologically grounded discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background on the replication crisis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.app.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 The replication problems which arise when AI applied in scientific research]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Is-Psychology-Finished? Is Psychology Finished?]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1983994242272993592 Bayer tested some findings and only achieved a 21% replication rate for biomedical studies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ontological-foundation-cornerstone-trustworthy-ai-shawn-riley-l3igc/ The Ontological Foundation: A Cornerstone for Trustworthy AI]&#039;&#039;, October 2024, with caveats added in &#039;&#039;&#039;bold face&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Explainability: Ontologies make AI decision-making processes more transparent and interpretable. By providing a clear, logical structure of knowledge, they allow for tracing the reasoning behind &#039;&#039;&#039;some&#039;&#039;&#039; AI decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Consistency: They &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; logical consistency across AI systems, reducing errors and contradictions. This is particularly crucial in complex domains where maintaining coherence is challenging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Interoperability: Ontologies &#039;&#039;&#039;help to foster&#039;&#039;&#039; seamless integration of knowledge from various sources and domains. This interoperability is essential for creating comprehensive AI systems that can reason across multiple areas of expertise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Semantic Richness: Ontologies capture nuanced relationships and constraints that go beyond simple hierarchical structures, allowing for more sophisticated reasoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Domain Expertise Encoding: They provide a means to formally encode human expert knowledge, &#039;&#039;&#039;to some extent&#039;&#039;&#039; bridging the gap between human understanding and machine processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Complex Systems and Cognitive Science: Why the Replication Problem is here to stay&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &#039;replication problem&#039; is the the inability of scientific communities to independently confirm the results of scientific work. Much has been written on this problem especially as it arises in (social) psychology, and on potential solutions under the heading of &#039;open science&#039;. But we will see that the replication problem has plagued medicine as a positive science since its beginnings (Virchov and Pasteur). This problem has become worse over the last 30 years and has massive consequences for healthcare practice and policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/s/m3nu15lqjw0qhpqycz3wjsai057p9jf6 Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Background:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility Reproducibility of Scientific Results], &#039;&#039;Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics Science has been in a “replication crisis” for a decade]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhDGkbw1FdwThe Irreproducibility Crisis and the Lehman Crash], Barry Smith, Youtube 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13: Landgrebe on machine intelligence. Jacko on psychopathic AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jobst Landgrebe: Why we cannot create intelligence inside a machine&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jobst-video Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Landgrebe-Limits Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Timothy W. Coleman: Beyond the Limits of AI: Ontology as a Framework for Good System Design (Student presentation)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael Behun III: The Paradox within Artificial Intelligence Development&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jan Jacko: Are intelligent machines psychopathic by design?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Lecture13-Jacko-Pathology Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two major paradigms in clinical psychology. The first treats mental and personality disorders as disturbances of an inner life: of subjective experience, affect, and self-awareness. This view cannot be meaningfully applied to artificial systems, for which no such subjectivity is given. The second paradigm is behavioural and functional. Here disorders, especially personality disorders, are defined as stable, recurrent patterns of behaviour, cognition, and interpersonal functioning that deviate from expected norms and impair adaptation. Psychopathy in this framework is a cluster of observable traits: persistent violation of social rules, instrumental treatment of others, chronically shallow or incongruent emotional expression, irresponsibility, and a striking absence of anxiety or inhibition in situations that normally elicit it. In this talk I adopt the second, behavioural paradigm and extend it to artificial systems, introducingthe notion of &#039;&#039;&#039;AI quasi-personality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14: Oral presentations (Compulsory for all students)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this class is &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background Material on AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to AI for Philosophers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmiY8_XVvzs Why not robot cops? Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Why-not-robot-cops Why not robot cops? Slides] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;An Introduction to Philosophy for Computer Scientists&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/What-is-philosophy Video]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/v/Crash-Course-Introduction Slides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://www.cp.eng.chula.ac.th/~prabhas/teaching/cbs-it-seminar/2012/aiphil-mccarthy.pdf John McCarthy, &amp;quot;What has AI in common with philosophy?&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cosmosandtaxis.org/ct-1256/ Companion volume to &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/Interviews_and_podcasts_on_%27%27Why_Machines_Will_Never_Rule_the_World%27%27 Podcasts and interviews on &#039;&#039;Why Machines Will Never Rule the World&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Learning Outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Comprehend the Architecture and Operation of Large Language Models: Explain the basic design and functioning of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Define and use correctly key terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Evaluate the Theoretical and Practical Limits of AI: Explain the limitations of AI systems as applications of Turing-computable mathematics. Critically assess claims about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the “singularity.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Examine Theories of Machine Consciousness, Transhumanism, and Simulation: Explain why machines lack intentionality and subjective experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Understand Ethical and Normative Dimensions of AI: Explain why AI systems cannot possess will, intention, or moral responsibility, and differentiate between AI ethics and ethics of AI use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Apply Ontology-Based Strategies for AI Enhancement: Explain how ontologies and knowledge graphs can improve the explainability, consistency, and interoperability of AI systems. Identify strengths and weaknesses of ontology-based and neurosymbolic AI approaches.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=164</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=164"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:06:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 14 (April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=163</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=163"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:06:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 13 (April 22), 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 April 22, 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=162</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=162"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:05:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* The synchronous part */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm as listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22), 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=161</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=161"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:04:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22), 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29, 7-8pm Second Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=160</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=160"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:04:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 13 (April 22), 7-8pm Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22), 7-8pm First Synchronous Question-Answer Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=159</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=159"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:03:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22), 7-8pm Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=158</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=158"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:02:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 9 (March 25): Relatively isolated systems */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=157</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=157"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:02:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Wednesday February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
/* 7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=156</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=156"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:01:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 9 (March 25): Relatively isolated systems */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
/* 7pm, Wednesday, March 25: Team meeting */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=155</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=155"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:01:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* 7pm, Wednesday February 25: Team meeting */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
== Wednesday February 25, 7-8pm: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=154</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=154"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T21:00:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 6 (February 25): Information Artifacts, Aboutness, and Language */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
==7pm, Wednesday February 25: Team meeting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=153</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=153"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T20:25:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 4 (February 11): Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWkk5AfRCpM Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=152</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=152"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T19:38:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Grading */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Additional expectations for students enrolled for 3 credits&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::Students enrolled for 3 credits may contribute extra work under the asynchronous or synchronous heading, for example serving as leader in a team. Please communicate with Dr Smith (ifomis@gmail.com) to discuss proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=151</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=151"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T19:32:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Week 12 (April 15) Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects, Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases, Why Most Ontologies Fail */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Midnight April 20: Deadline for submission of your question+answer emails==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=150</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=150"/>
		<updated>2026-02-10T19:32:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* Grading */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=149</id>
		<title>BFO-Intro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aowiki.nsm.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=BFO-Intro&amp;diff=149"/>
		<updated>2026-02-09T12:28:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Phismith: /* The asynchronous part */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==PHI 598LEC Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spring 2026&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faculty: Dr. Barry Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ONLINE, HYBRID, TWO CREDIT COURSE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This course will present an introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), which is a widely used top-level ontology, approved in 2021 as international standard ISO/IEC 21838-2. The course is divided into an &#039;&#039;&#039;asynchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; part, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The asynchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consists of a series of videos in week-by-week order as listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lectures will form part of the basis for &#039;&#039;&#039;synchronous&#039;&#039;&#039; working sessions, in which students will be divided into teams. Each month students will give presentations on the results of the work of their team thus far. The final two sessions will be devoted to question-answer sessions (see under &#039;Grading&#039; below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will find further treatment of many of the issues addressed in the videos in the BFO textbook, which is listed under Background Reading below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The synchronous part==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will consist of practical work by students, either working alone or (preferably) as members of teams. The results of this work will then be communicated through a series of zoom meetings, supplemented by associated discussions on our Slack channel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will participate in working sessions designed to lead to the creation of online content -- essays, videos, articles, ... -- for example summarizing (or criticizing) aspects of BFO or describing how BFO can be used in specific areas, or reviewing what results when LLMs are used in BFO coding, or how BFO helps you solve a problem at work. Ideally the content should be suitable for distribution to a wider audience. These working sessions will involve teams, which will be put together in the early weeks of the class with the aid of Elena Miliventi, who is my research assistant (and also a student in this glass). It is hoped that one team will address the charges made against BFO in the paper &lt;br /&gt;
[https://buffalo.box.com/v/BFO-Expert-Coding BFO Expert Coding Challenge] (perhaps considering also the  [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=53308182319355410&amp;amp;as_sdt=5,33&amp;amp;sciodt=0,33&amp;amp;hl=en Citations] to this paper). Other ideas are: a series of tiktok videos or LinkedIn contributions presenting key aspects of BFO; articles intended for publication; projects demonstrating the utility of BFO e.g. for solving problems you face at work, proposals to improve BFO, and so on. Here creativity will contribute to your grade for this class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those students who have a suitable project which they wish to realize on their own, regular meetings with Dr Smith and/or with Ms Miliventi will be organized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Working sessions are tentatively scheduled to take place from 7-8pm on dates to be announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 1 (January 21): Inaugural session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 2 (January 28): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology 101]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an introduction to building ontologies with BFO, with special reference to the rules for deciding whether a given general term designates a universal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 3 (February 4): BFO Tutorial (2019): A series of 6 [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyngZgIl3WTj6tWcypTLpCnYXu6o93kD4 Videos]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a survey of main features of BFO itself in the form of a series of short tutorials. It deals with BFO 2.0, which differs slightly from BFO 2020, which is the most current version. However the differences relate not to BFO itself, but rather to the new First Order Logic axiomatization of BFO, which was introduced with the ISO standard. Details (for those who are interested in such matters) can be found here: https://ncorwiki.buffalo.edu/index.php/BFO_Release_History. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 4 (February 11): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbzF9p7qvk Basic Formal Ontology Tutorial]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a presentation to an audience of engineers at a meeting of the Industrial Ontologies Foundry. It contains examples of what happens when people argue about BFO. BFO is a realist ontology, which means that all terms of BFO are intended to refer to something that exist. How, then, do we provide a BFO-conformant treatment of the work of an industrial designer, at the point where the object he is designing does not yet exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 5 (February 18): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwsBxRs9kns The Ontology of Science]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Focuses on the Focuses on the ontology of biology, and on the issue of multi-level ontology -- from molecules to cells to organisms, and from functions at the molecular level to downstream biological processes. BFO claims to be a multi-perspectival ontology, and in particular a multi-granularity ontology, which can work on each of these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 6 (February 25): [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTx_rRWmTqE Information Artifacts], [https://youtu.be/PBKsupBquok Aboutness], and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3btP1InPZY Language]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:BFO does not contain terms relating to information entities such as words or mathematical equations or poems. Instead it draws on the category of generically dependent continuants (GDCs), which then forms the starting point of the Information Artifact Ontology. Information artifacts are GDCs which are about something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 7 (March 4): [https://youtu.be/G4lg1_-XpiE Ontology of Terrorism]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Acts of terrorism are often described in terms of &amp;quot;sending a message&amp;quot; (for example to a government) through violence or threats of violence. We present the beginnings of an ontology of terrorism on this basis, drawing on the theory of speech acts but also on a more general theory of language according to which a language is a set of capabilities associated with a set of behaviors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 8 (March 11): [https://youtu.be/jH1sc7FTs3w Capabilities (2022)]; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTVR7k63_VA BFO and DOLCE]==&lt;br /&gt;
:The first of these two videos proposes a definition of capability as a universal falling between function and disposition as the latter are defined in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Capabilities are like functions in that they can be evaluated on the basis of how well they are realized. They differ from functions in that they are not the rationale for the existence of their bearers. Thus, a water pump may have, in addition to its function of pumping water, many capabilities including: to be weatherproof, to run without lubricant, and so forth. We argue, that all functions are capabilities, but not all capabilities are functions, and we develop a series of axioms to distinguish capabilities formally from both dispositions and functions. We provide examples of the use of capability in a variety of domains, focusing on a definition of language as a capability of persons.&lt;br /&gt;
:The second video presents a view of how BFO functions as a support for its users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 9 (March 25): [https://youtu.be/-OUr0tuFloM Relatively isolated systems]==&lt;br /&gt;
:Ingarden&#039;s work on ontology is one of the principal sources motivating the creation of BFO. We here present Ingarden&#039;s work on systems of different types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 10 (April 1) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0masZPGLb0 ISO/IEC 21838]==&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the top-level ontology / BFO standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 11 (April 8) JOWO [https://youtu.be/VYDe09TOw2M Part 1], [https://studio.youtube.com/video/wh_KZGXc1Es/edit Part 2], [https://youtu.be/fkkWkTIxrNQ Temporalized Relations]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Begins with a 2-part video of a tutorial presented at the JOWO (Joint Ontologies Workshops). Part 1 introduces BFO to a technical audience. Part 2 provides a brief exposition of the rationale for including temporalized relations in the OWL specification of BFO 2020 (ISO/IEC 21838:2). Since OWL can accommodate only two-place relations, and since the de facto standard formalization of BFO uses OWL, there is a need for strategies to capture the temporal dimensions of general assertions such as &amp;quot;Milk teeth are lost as children grow&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Thermally heated machines are inspected every 6 months.&amp;quot; The third video provides an attempt at a simplified exposition of the issues involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 12 (April 15) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJcu0UKQyo Sites, Boundaries, Qualities, Objects], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UmKWQ-fH4s Qualities, Dispositions, Diseases], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5d5KmBqw3w Why Most Ontologies Fail]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 13 (April 22) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Week 14 (April 29) Synchronous Question-Answer Session 2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students will be graded on the basis of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1. questions (and answers) assembled by students over the course of the semest​er &lt;br /&gt;
::For each video, the student should prepare exactly one single-sentence question relating to the content of this video, together with a 1-paragraph answer to this question. The answer should not be contained in the video content for this class. All questions and answers should be sent in a single email to ifomis@gmail.com on April 30.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. interactions and results of the synchronous phase &lt;br /&gt;
::Dr Smith and Ms Milivinti will keep track of your interactions in support of your creative work during the course of the semester. Dr Smith will evaluate this content and also results of your work. Features to be graded will include: creativity, quantity of your contributions, success of your project(s).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both 1. and 2. determine 50% of the total grade. Where team work is graded members of teams will receive equal grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.iso.org/standard/74572.html ISO standard]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://grokipedia.com/page/basic_formal_ontology Grokipedia on Basic Formal Ontology]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://github.com/PR0CK0/awesome-bfo Awesome BFO]&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://buffalo.box.com/s/3pyas5wwfwd2bgbe5o2dz36kncm9z5gf] R. Arp, B. Smith, A. Spear, &#039;&#039;Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology&#039;&#039;, Cambridge MA: MIT Press (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/JANCIT-2] Jansen, Ludger, and Barry Smith. &amp;quot;Categories in Top-Level Ontologies: Revisiting the Aristotelian Background,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Advances in Knowledge Representation&#039;&#039;, 5(3) (2025).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMAST] Peter M. Simons, &amp;quot;Against Set Theory&amp;quot;, in: &#039;&#039;Experience and Analysis&#039;&#039;, Vienna: HPT&amp;amp;ÖBV, 143-152 (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://philarchive.org/rec/SMIBCO] Barry Smith, &amp;quot;Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation,&amp;quot; in: &#039;&#039;Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems&#039;&#039; (FOIS 2004), 73-84. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Supplementary Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! # !! Video Title !! Duration !! YouTube Link&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || The Ontology of (Supply Chain) Services || 11:35 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1Zlunh3eMw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || Industrial Ontologies Foundry (2022) || 7:52 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfsimHTApU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || Ontology of (Social) Services || 10:38 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qrwWAISrC8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || Ontology Foundries || 20:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFiwmq7f4wQ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || BFO Tutorial (2019). Part 1: Introduction to BFO ISO || 41:11 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muafRW0bXgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || IOF: Draft BFO Formalization Proposal. 1-25-2019 || 31:06 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJgE-O2iREM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 || How BFO Deals with Data from Multiple Contexts || 16:31 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AsCDBRJpM&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8 || Why Do We Need Upper-Level Ontologies? || 20:47 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjf9zeCh_Sw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9 || Are there Capabilities on Mars? || 1:30:51 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo7iPP2wKgw&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1) || 54:17 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0f2Us0hr0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 2) || 53:01 || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vdUUhF4JdE&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Phismith</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>